planning-with-files

planning-with-files is a command for Claude Code from naimkatiman/continuous-improvement. It costs 22 tokens per session (426 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command for keeping a task plan, research notes, and progress record in separate project files. It is intended for users who explicitly want planning to persist between work sessions.

In plain words
What is it for?
It helps organize research, planning, execution, verification, and reflection in task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md.
Why use it?
It prevents plans, findings, and verification notes from being lost when the conversation ends or the task is resumed later.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: a Claude Code command (commands/*.md).

Good fit It helps organize research, planning, execution, verification, and reflection in task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/planning-with-files
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for planning-with-files

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/planning-with-files.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/planning-with-files)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/planning-with-files"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/planning-with-files.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 22 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 426 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00022 $0.00426
Opus 5 $0.00011 $0.00213
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00085
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00043

Measured 7d ago against content hash 6438e9b5bdb6, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

planning-with-files scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

commands/planning-with-files.md · 67 lines

What it actually says

/planning-with-files

Use this workflow only when the user explicitly wants persistent, file-based planning. It is opt-in.

Project Root

  1. Run git rev-parse --show-toplevel 2>/dev/null
  2. If that fails, use the current working directory
  3. Create and read planning files in that root only

The planning files are:

  • task_plan.md
  • findings.md
  • progress.md

init

If the files do not exist, create them in the project root.

task_plan.md must include:

  • ## Goal
  • ## Status
  • ## Phases
  • ## Key Questions
  • ## Decisions Made
  • ## Errors Encountered

Default phases:

  • Research
  • Plan
  • Execute
  • Verify
  • Reflect

Never overwrite existing planning files unless the user explicitly asks you to reset or replace them.

status

Read all three files and summarize:

  • Current status from task_plan.md
  • Checked vs unchecked phases
  • Whether findings.md has real notes yet
  • Whether progress.md has real session or verification entries yet

If the files do not exist, say so and offer to initialize them.

checkpoint

After a meaningful work chunk:

  • Update progress.md with what happened, commands run, and verification notes
  • Add new discoveries or sources to findings.md
  • Update task_plan.md progress, decisions, and errors

Do not hide failures. Log them in ## Errors Encountered.

recover

When resuming after context loss or a new session:

  • Re-read task_plan.md, findings.md, and progress.md before making major decisions
  • Restate the current goal, phase, open questions, and latest verification state
  • Continue from the recorded plan instead of rebuilding context from memory
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 7d ago First seen · 67 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A 6438e9b5bdb6

Subscribe to this mod's changes

planning-with-files is a command published in the GitHub repository naimkatiman/continuous-improvement (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 426 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.