Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/naimkatiman/continuous-improvementWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/production-readiness-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/production-readiness-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/production-readiness-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/production-readiness-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/naimkatiman/continuous-improvement/production-readiness-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00065 | $0.00849 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00425 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00170 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00085 |
Grade A, and why
production-readiness-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 55 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/production-readiness-review
The review-side sibling of /ship. Fans a set of blind, specialized reviewers across distinct dimensions, then reconciles their findings into a single prioritized punch-list. It reports — it does not fix. Fixing a finding is a separate /ship run.
Pure routing over existing skills and agents. Adds no new code.
Usage
/production-readiness-review [scope]
scope defaults to the current branch diff against origin/main. Pass a path or PR number to narrow it.
Behavior
- Scope — establish ground truth: the diff under review and which changes are recent (
git diff;reconcilefallback for branch/base state). Recent changes get extra scrutiny because they are the likeliest source of self-inflicted defects. - Fan out —
superpowers:dispatching-parallel-agentslaunches five reviewers, each blind to the others. Every reviewer is instructed to ground each finding in real code, logs, or live queries, and never to assume or fabricate state:- Performance & bundle-size — hot paths, N+1 queries, unbounded work, regressions.
- Security & data-access (
security-auditor) — authn/authz, input handling, injection, secret exposure, unsafe data access. - UI/UX correctness — verified live with Playwright when the MCP is available, else static review of the changed surface.
- Test coverage & flaky/stale mocks (
test-engineer) — uncovered branches, stale mocks, timing-flaky tests. - Simplicity & over-engineering (
simplicity-review) — code that could reuse an existing file, a stdlib or native feature, or fewer lines; reports trim opportunities via the reuse ladder and never flags input validation, data-loss handling, security, or accessibility.
- Reconcile — a final pass dedupes findings across reviewers, ranks each CRITICAL / HIGH / MEDIUM / LOW by severity and confidence, and explicitly flags any defect introduced by the changes under review.
- Present — emit the consolidated punch-list, severity-ranked, with file references. Stop.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 55 lines · 65 tokens per session scan A 073d21432f04
production-readiness-review is a command published in the GitHub repository naimkatiman/continuous-improvement (7 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 65 tokens to every session and 849 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
qa
QA sign-off command. Verifies a change against acceptance criteria, runs the test suite, probes edge cases, and issues a ship / no-ship verdict via the qa-lead agent.
tests
Test coverage quality analysis — behavioral coverage, critical gap identification, test resilience evaluation.
gsd-review
Route to the appropriate quality / review skill based on the user's intent. gsd-code-review-fix was absorbed by gsd-code-review --fix in #2790.
pr-enhance
Command "pr-enhance" from Soulcynics404/AgentForge, covering pr-enhance, usage, options, examples and enhance pr.
speckit.review.errors
Error handling review — silent failure detection, catch block analysis, error logging.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.