Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nathanimphilipos/synergos-grcWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/nathanimphilipos/synergos-grc/gap-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nathanimphilipos/synergos-grc/gap-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nathanimphilipos/synergos-grc/gap-analysis.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00743 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00371 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00149 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00074 |
Grade A, and why
gap-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 7d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to gap-analysis — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 108 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/grc:gap-analysis
Perform a structured gap analysis against a compliance framework.
Usage
/grc:gap-analysis [framework] [scope-description]
Arguments
- framework: The target compliance framework. Accepts same aliases as
control-lookup. - scope-description: Brief description of what's in scope (system, organization, service).
Examples
/grc:gap-analysis fedramp moderate SaaS platform
/grc:gap-analysis soc2 security+availability cloud service
/grc:gap-analysis iso27001 entire organization
/grc:gap-analysis pci e-commerce payment processing
/grc:gap-analysis cmmc level2 CUI handling system
/grc:gap-analysis hipaa patient portal
Behavior
When invoked:
-
Identify the framework and scope from arguments.
-
Read the framework reference file and the readiness/gap analysis reference (
audits/readiness-gap-analysis.md). -
Present a structured gap analysis template organized by:
a. Control families/categories for the target framework b. Assessment criteria per control area:
- Implemented (control fully in place with evidence)
- Partially Implemented (some aspects in place)
- Planned (not yet implemented but on roadmap)
- Not Implemented (no plans currently)
- Not Applicable (with justification) c. Maturity assessment (optional):
- Level 0: Non-existent
- Level 1: Ad-hoc
- Level 2: Repeatable
- Level 3: Defined
- Level 4: Managed
- Level 5: Optimizing
-
For each control family, provide:
- Key controls to assess
- Questions to ask during assessment
- Evidence to look for
- Common gaps in that area
- Remediation complexity estimate (Low/Medium/High)
-
Generate a gap analysis worksheet the user can work through interactively:
- Walk through each control family
- Ask about current state
- Record gaps
- Build prioritized remediation roadmap
-
If the user provides current-state information, assess gaps and produce:
- Gap summary heat map (by family)
- Prioritized findings
- Remediation roadmap with effort estimates
- Quick wins vs long-term items
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 7d ago First seen · 108 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A c4040206ccac
gap-analysis is a command published in the GitHub repository nathanimphilipos/synergos-grc (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 743 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to gap-analysis, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
deps-audit
Audit project dependencies for vulnerabilities, outdated packages, license conflicts, and supply chain risks — then provide actionable remediation strategies.
review-epo-claims
Analyze patent claims for EPO Art. 84 EPC compliance - clarity, conciseness, support by description.
voice-compliance
Voice/telephony compliance check — invokes voice-ai-reviewer to produce TM-voice-{slug}.md with TCPA, STIR/SHAKEN, state recording-consent, EU AI Act Art. 50, and synth-voice deepfake-law gaps.
review-policy
Review a policy document for structure, coverage, and language quality.
at-dsgvo
You are helping an enterprise architect generate an Austrian Data Protection Assessment — the Austrian-specific GDPR layer applied by the Datenschutzbehörde (DSB) under the Datenschutzgesetz (DSG 2018, BGBl. I Nr. 165/1999 as amended). Run this after /arckit:eu-rgpd to add Austrian obligations that go beyond the EU…
au-pspf
You are an enterprise architect generating a Protective Security Policy Framework (PSPF) compliance assessment for an Australian Government entity or contractor handling government information.