A command that checks a System Security Plan (SSP)—a document describing how an organisation protects its systems—against FedRAMP, NIST, or FISMA requirements.

Use it to review an SSP table of contents, section headings, or pasted section text for required structure, coverage, and narrative quality.

It helps find missing sections and incomplete content before a compliance review. The check can use a selected security level such as low, moderate, or high.

review-ssp — Command for Claude Code by nathanimphilipos

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nathanimphilipos/synergos-grc

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install grc, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 1 skill, 27 commands.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nathanimphilipos/synergos-grc/review-ssp/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/nathanimphilipos/synergos-grc/review-ssp)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nathanimphilipos/synergos-grc/review-ssp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nathanimphilipos/synergos-grc/review-ssp/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nathanimphilipos/synergos-grc/review-ssp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nathanimphilipos/synergos-grc/review-ssp.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 11 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.

When invoked 1,485 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.

Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00011	$0.01485
Opus 5	$0.00005	$0.00743
Sonnet 5	$0.00002	$0.00297
Haiku 4.5	$0.00001	$0.00148

Measured 11d ago against content hash 53cef33e1cad, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-11, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review-ssp scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to review-ssp — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

grc/commands/review-ssp.md · 163 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 163 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/grc:review-ssp

Validate SSP structure and completeness against FedRAMP template standards.

Usage

/grc:review-ssp [framework] [baseline?]

The user pastes their SSP table of contents, section headers, or section content after invoking the command.

Arguments

framework: The compliance framework. Accepts: fedramp, nist, fisma. Defaults to fedramp.
baseline (optional): low, moderate, high. Defaults to moderate.

Examples

/grc:review-ssp fedramp
/grc:review-ssp fedramp high
/grc:review-ssp nist moderate
/grc:review-ssp fedramp moderate

Behavior

When invoked:

Display the Data Sensitivity Notice at the top of every response (see SKILL.md Data Handling section).
Read the appropriate reference files:
- skills/grc-knowledge/audits/document-section-requirements.md for SSP section requirements
- Framework file from skills/grc-knowledge/frameworks/ for baseline-specific requirements
- skills/grc-knowledge/audits/narrative-quality-criteria.md if reviewing narrative sections
Determine what the user provided:
- Table of contents / section headers: Validate against required SSP sections
- Specific section content: Review that section for completeness
- Full or partial SSP content: Assess both structure and content
For TOC / structural review, check against all required SSP sections:

a. Section Checklist For each required SSP section (per FedRAMP template):
- Present: Section exists in the TOC/headers
- Missing: Section not found — flag criticality level
b. Critical Sections Flag these as critical if missing — each would be a finding:
- System categorization (FIPS 199)
- System description and architecture
- Authorization boundary diagram
- Network architecture diagram
- Data flow diagrams
- Ports, protocols, and services table
- Control implementation narratives
- System interconnections
- Required appendices (CIS/CRM, contingency plan, IRP, CMP)

Read the full file on GitHub · 163 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

11d ago First seen · 163 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 53cef33e1cad

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review-ssp is a command published in the GitHub repository nathanimphilipos/synergos-grc (5 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 1,485 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to review-ssp, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.

Documents Security

brand-generate

Generate an on-brand document from a saved Brand Profile.

ferdinandobons/brand-docs · 0 tokens

prose-review-docs

Reviews markdown documentation files or directories against the active prose style rules — the plugin's vendor-neutral baseline plus your organization's overlay when one is configured. Accepts a file path or directory (recursive). Runs prose-style-checker and optionally Vale. Supports --fix to auto-apply safe…

ihudak/ihudak-claude-plugins · 67 tokens

review-ssp