Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/navraj007in/architecture-cowork-pluginWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/navraj007in/architecture-cowork-plugin/import)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/navraj007in/architecture-cowork-plugin/import"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/navraj007in/architecture-cowork-plugin/import/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/navraj007in/architecture-cowork-plugin/import"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/navraj007in/architecture-cowork-plugin/import.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00014 | $0.00672 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00336 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00134 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00067 |
Grade A, and why
import scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 11d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 49 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/architect:import
Trigger
/architect:import [scan context JSON]
Purpose
Analyze an existing codebase folder. Using the static scan results (detected tech stack, frameworks, databases, etc.) as a starting point, perform a deep analysis of the actual source code to understand the architecture, then generate:
solution.sdl.yaml— A complete SDL capturing the inferred architecturearchitecture-output/import-analysis.md— Detailed findings reportintent.json— Derived project intent for lifecycle continuity
FIDELITY RULE — SDL must reflect current reality, not aspirations.
The SDL generated by import describes what is actually in the codebase right now — nothing more. Do NOT add patterns, sections, or fields that are absent from the code just because they are good practice or would be present in an ideal architecture.
- If no circuit breaker library is detected → do NOT add
resilience.circuitBreaker- If no SLO config exists → do NOT add
slos.services[]targets- If no health check endpoints exist → do NOT add
observability.healthChecks- If no compliance signals exist → do NOT add
compliance.frameworks- If no design tokens exist → do NOT add
design.typography- Features in
features.sdl.yaml= only what is currently built, not what should be built- Costs in
costs.sdl.yaml= only costs visible in Terraform/compose/env vars, not ideal projectionsMissing patterns belong in the Recommendations section of
import-analysis.md, not in the SDL. The SDL is a snapshot of reality.blueprintis for ideal architecture.
Workflow
This command is split across five files for size (each part is a continuation of the previous — read them in order):
| Part | File | Steps |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | command-parts/import-1.md |
Step 0 (detect scan mode) · Step 1 (load scan context) · Step 2 (deep source analysis) |
| 2 | command-parts/import-2.md |
Step 3.1 (mapping rules) · Step 3.2 (SDL output structure) |
| 3 | command-parts/import-3.md |
Step 3.3 (write modular files) · Step 3.4 (confidence report) · Step 3.5 (unknowns & review checklist) · Step 3.2a (multi-file SDL) · Step 3.3 validation |
| 4 | command-parts/import-4.md |
Step 4 (generate import analysis) |
| 5 | command-parts/import-5.md |
Step 5 (generate intent) · Step 6 (generate recommendations) |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 11d ago First seen · 49 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 6bc7447df87f
import is a command published in the GitHub repository navraj007in/architecture-cowork-plugin (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 672 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
nyann:doctor
Run nyann's read-only hygiene + documentation audit on the current repo. Emits the same drift sections retrofit uses, but never offers remediation or writes to the filesystem. Use this on session start, in CI, or any time you want to sanity-check a repo without risking mutations.
nyann:retrofit
Audit an existing repo against a profile and fix what's drifted. Unlike doctor (read-only), retrofit detects missing hooks, misconfigured gitignore, documentation gaps, and non-compliant history, then offers to remediate via bootstrap. Idempotent — safe to re-run.
nyann:apply
Apply an Infrastructure-as-Code change — the highest-stakes mutator in nyann; it can change real cloud infrastructure. Re-runs the plan, shows it, confirms, then applies. Unmistakably opt-in: apply is never the default and destructive applies require a second explicit confirm. For IaC apply intent only (not "apply a…
nyann:hotfix
Create the branch topology for a patch release against a previously tagged version. Ensures release/ . exists from the source tag, then creates hotfix/ off it. After this, the user commits the fix and runs /nyann:release from the hotfix branch.
nyann:release
Cut a release: generate a CHANGELOG section from Conventional Commits, make a release commit, and create an annotated tag. Defaults to conventional-changelog strategy.
nyann:ship
Open a GitHub pull request AND merge it in one step. Default uses GitHub's native auto-merge (returns immediately with outcome:"queued"); --client-side polls for green CI in the foreground then runs gh pr merge. Requires gh installed + authed.