Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ngtiendong/Academic-Research-Agent-SkillWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ngtiendong/academic-research-agent-skill/reviewer-sim)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ngtiendong/academic-research-agent-skill/reviewer-sim"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ngtiendong/academic-research-agent-skill/reviewer-sim/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ngtiendong/academic-research-agent-skill/reviewer-sim"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ngtiendong/academic-research-agent-skill/reviewer-sim.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00256 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00102 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00051 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
reviewer-sim scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/reviewer-sim
Act as three reviewers: supportive, skeptical, and methods-focused.
Language
Follow config/language.yaml when present.
Task
Review a scope, draft, experiment plan, or result package.
Procedure
- Check novelty, clarity, evidence, methodology, experiments, and writing.
- Review the measurement layer: null models for bounded variables (independence null, not additive), notation completeness, operational definitions of headline terms, and claim-arm coverage (every claim gate maps to an experiment arm or ID).
- Separate critical issues from minor issues.
- Give concrete fixes, not generic advice.
- Identify claims that need source or artifact support.
- Check for narrative salvage: at least one failed mandatory result must stop, drop, or materially narrow the claim.
- Reconcile summary scores, evidence counts, and gate verdicts against section-level or row-level evidence.
- Require within-model or within-condition validity before attributing differences to architecture, family, or mechanism labels.
Output
Overall Scorefrom 1 to 10Critical IssuesMinor IssuesMissing EvidenceRecommended Fix PlanAcceptability After Fixes
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +3 lines cf7dc5e9beee
- 2mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 7e4cabebb387
reviewer-sim is a command published in the GitHub repository ngtiendong/Academic-Research-Agent-Skill (68 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 256 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
reviewer-sim compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| reviewer-simngtiendong/Academic-Research-Agent-Skill | Command | 68 | 1mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| implementgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | yesterday | MIT | A | 14 | Claude Code |