Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to NguyenSiTrung/Conductor-Beads. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NguyenSiTrung/Conductor-Beads/main/.claude/skills/beads/commands/decision.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NguyenSiTrung/Conductor-BeadsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/nguyensitrung/conductor-beads/decision)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nguyensitrung/conductor-beads/decision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nguyensitrung/conductor-beads/decision/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nguyensitrung/conductor-beads/decision"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nguyensitrung/conductor-beads/decision.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00662 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00265 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00132 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00066 |
Grade A, and why
decision scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
94% identical to decision — 4 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 112 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Record and track project decisions as beads issues with structured rationale, alternatives considered, and links to affected work.
Decisions use --type decision. The description field holds the structured decision record.
Record a Decision
When the user wants to record a decision (or you invoke bd decision record):
-
Gather the following (ask if not provided):
- Title: Short summary of what was decided (required)
- Rationale: Why this was chosen (required)
- Alternatives: What else was considered (optional but encouraged)
- Affects: Issue IDs this decision impacts (optional)
- Priority: How important (default P2)
-
Create the issue with structured description:
bd create "<title>" --type decision \
--description "$(cat <<'EOF'
## Decision
<one-sentence summary of what was decided>
## Rationale
<why this was chosen>
## Alternatives Considered
- **<alt 1>**: <why rejected>
- **<alt 2>**: <why rejected>
## Affects
- <issue IDs or area descriptions>
EOF
)"
- If
--affectsissue IDs were provided, link them:
bd dep add <decision-id> <affected-id> --type related
- Show the created decision to the user.
List Decisions
bd list --type decision
To see all decisions including closed/superseded:
bd list --type decision --all
Show a Decision
bd show <decision-id>
Include comments for discussion history:
bd comments <decision-id>
Supersede a Decision
When a decision is replaced by a new one:
- Record the new decision (as above)
- Link the new decision to the old one:
bd dep add <new-id> <old-id> --type related - Add a comment on the old decision:
bd comments add <old-id> "Superseded by <new-id>: <brief reason>" - Close the old decision:
bd close <old-id> --reason "Superseded by <new-id>"
Add Context to an Existing Decision
Use comments to append discussion, implementation notes, or revisit rationale:
bd comments add <decision-id> "Implementation note: ..."
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 112 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A d62efc7e0d0b
decision is a command published in the GitHub repository NguyenSiTrung/Conductor-Beads (23 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 662 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 94% identical to decision, differing in 4 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
template
Manage issue templates for streamlined issue creation.
add-note
Add an internal or external note to a ConnectWise PSA ticket.
fest-show
Show festival progression (in-progress tasks, roadmap, and dependency view).
sync-linear
Sync current work with Linear ticket status.
dispatcher
Use when you want the orchestrator to pick the next repo to work on across your whole portfolio — it enumerates candidate repos below the confinement root, resolves free/busy from each repo's session.lock lease, ranks the FREE ones by backlog priority × staleness × readiness, recommends the single most worthwhile one…
workpm
A project-management workflow for coordinating multiple AI workers through five stages. It includes task assignment, shared activity logs, worker replacement, and final checks.