design-review

A seven-stage review of a web page or URL covering accessibility, screen-size layouts, and user interactions. WCAG AA is a commonly used accessibility standard for making websites usable by people with disabilities.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to audit a page, navigation, checkout flow, or local web file, with browser screenshots when available.
Why use it?
It finds and ranks problems across desktop and mobile views, including serious issues that should be fixed first.

Command for Claude Code

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/nicohodt/claude-code-ui-ux-skill/design-review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nicohodt/claude-code-ui-ux-skill

Made for: Claude Code.

Per session 21 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 174 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin 100% copy Near-identical to another mod in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00021 $0.00174
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.00087
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00035
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00017

Measured yesterday against content hash df81f0c262ff, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

design-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

This is a copy

100% identical to design-review — 0 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.

stack/.claude/commands/design-review.md · 16 lines

What it actually says


description: Run the 7-phase design review (WCAG AA, responsive, interaction) on a page or URL argument-hint: [url-or-file] [optional focus, e.g. "mobile nav" or "checkout flow"]

Use the design-review subagent to audit the target below. Drive a real browser via the Playwright MCP, screenshot each viewport tier, and return ranked findings (Blockers → Nitpicks).

Target: $1 Focus (optional): $2

If no target was given, ask for the running dev-server URL (or a file path). If a browser cannot be opened, fall back to node scripts/design-audit.mjs and report only the heuristic findings, clearly labeled as such. Fix Blockers and High-severity findings before reporting the work as complete.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. yesterday First seen · 16 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A df81f0c262ff

Subscribe to this mod's changes

design-review is a command published in the GitHub repository nicohodt/claude-code-ui-ux-skill (2 stars, last pushed 29d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 21 tokens to every session and 174 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to design-review, differing in 0 lines, and is treated as a copy.