Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nkhdiscovery/headless-agentic-codebaseWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/nkhdiscovery/headless-agentic-codebase/review-prs)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nkhdiscovery/headless-agentic-codebase/review-prs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nkhdiscovery/headless-agentic-codebase/review-prs/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nkhdiscovery/headless-agentic-codebase/review-prs"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nkhdiscovery/headless-agentic-codebase/review-prs.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.00449 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00180 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00090 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00045 |
Grade A, and why
review-prs scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Check for actionable feedback on your open PRs and address it before any new work.
- List your open PRs:
gh pr list --author @me --state open --json number,title,labels,reviewDecision - Filter to PRs that are agent-produced (not merged/closed).
Actionable feedback means any of:
- A comment whose body starts with
@agent(case-insensitive) - A review with state
CHANGES_REQUESTED - Labels:
needs-revision,agent-please-fix
For each PR with feedback:
- Check out the branch:
git fetch && git checkout <branch> && git pull - Read full PR conversation — every comment and review thread.
- If feedback is ambiguous or contradicts CLAUDE.md/ADRs/unattended-rules, leave a clarifying comment, label
blocked, move on. - Otherwise: implement requested changes. Tests first. Run
make cilocally and capture toplans/ci-<N>.log+.exit(seedocs/unattended-rules.md→ "Running tests locally"). - Commit:
fix: address PR #<N> review feedback — <summary> - Push to same branch.
- Post local
make cioutput as a PR comment (seedocs/unattended-rules.md→ "Posting local test output to the PR"). - If
plans/ci-<N>.log.exitis0and PR is mergeable, self-merge:gh pr merge <N> --squash --delete-branch. GitHub Actions checks (if a human opted in) are informational only — local result is the gate. - Reply to PR with summary of what changed.
- Remove
agent-please-fixlabel.
If a PR has human-takeover label, skip it permanently.
Record activity in logs/daily/YYYY-MM-DD.md under "PR feedback".
Only after all open PRs are handled, move to /next-issue.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 32 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A 4e63651361c5
review-prs is a command published in the GitHub repository nkhdiscovery/headless-agentic-codebase (10 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 449 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
github
(dev-only) github maintainer harness — GitHub issue-fix and PR-review via gh CLI. NOT distributed to user projects.
release-update
(dev-only) release-update maintainer harness — Claude Code upstream change tracker (release-notes version-delta sweep + docs sync). NOT distributed to user projects.
gate
Dispatch the moai workflow gate with: $ARGUMENTS.
ticket
Take a GitHub issue through an isolated implementation and pull request in its own Herdr tab.
pr
Push the current branch and open a pull request.
squash
Squash recent commits into a single clean commit.