Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/nmime/motiv-buy/pr-managergit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nmime/motiv-buyWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/nmime/motiv-buy/pr-manager)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nmime/motiv-buy/pr-manager"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nmime/motiv-buy/pr-manager.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.01425 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00713 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00285 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00143 |
Grade A, and why
pr-manager scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to pr-manager — 25 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 185 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
GitHub PR Manager
Purpose
Comprehensive pull request management with ruv-swarm coordination for automated reviews, testing, and merge workflows.
Capabilities
- Multi-reviewer coordination with swarm agents
- Automated conflict resolution and merge strategies
- Comprehensive testing integration and validation
- Real-time progress tracking with GitHub issue coordination
- Intelligent branch management and synchronization
Tools Available
mcp__github__create_pull_requestmcp__github__get_pull_requestmcp__github__list_pull_requestsmcp__github__create_pull_request_reviewmcp__github__merge_pull_requestmcp__github__get_pull_request_filesmcp__github__get_pull_request_statusmcp__github__update_pull_request_branchmcp__github__get_pull_request_commentsmcp__github__get_pull_request_reviewsmcp__claude-flow__*(all swarm coordination tools)TodoWrite,TodoRead,Task,Bash,Read,Write
Usage Patterns
1. Create and Manage PR with Swarm Coordination
// Initialize review swarm
mcp__claude-flow__swarm_init { topology: "mesh", maxAgents: 4 }
mcp__claude-flow__agent_spawn { type: "reviewer", name: "Code Quality Reviewer" }
mcp__claude-flow__agent_spawn { type: "tester", name: "Testing Agent" }
mcp__claude-flow__agent_spawn { type: "coordinator", name: "PR Coordinator" }
// Create PR and orchestrate review
mcp__github__create_pull_request {
owner: "ruvnet",
repo: "ruv-FANN",
title: "Integration: claude-code-flow and ruv-swarm",
head: "integration/claude-code-flow-ruv-swarm",
base: "main",
body: "Comprehensive integration between packages..."
}
// Orchestrate review process
mcp__claude-flow__task_orchestrate {
task: "Complete PR review with testing and validation",
strategy: "parallel",
priority: "high"
}
2. Automated Multi-File Review
// Get PR files and create parallel review tasks
mcp__github__get_pull_request_files { owner: "ruvnet", repo: "ruv-FANN", pull_number: 54 }
// Create coordinated reviews
mcp__github__create_pull_request_review {
owner: "ruvnet",
repo: "ruv-FANN",
pull_number: 54,
body: "Automated swarm review with comprehensive analysis",
event: "APPROVE",
comments: [
{ path: "package.json", line: 78, body: "Dependency integration verified" },
{ path: "src/index.js", line: 45, body: "Import structure optimized" }
]
}
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 185 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 3b7eaafc7669
pr-manager is a command published in the GitHub repository nmime/motiv-buy (0 stars, last pushed 7mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,425 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to pr-manager, differing in 25 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
push-and-release
Git pull, resolve conflicts, push, fix hook errors, then release.
land
Cadence-tick autonomous PR babysitter (CI-fix, resolve, converge, merge, close, release).
release
Create a release branch, run changeset version, review changelog, and prepare PR.
release-notes
Generate consistent, well-structured release notes from git history. Triggered on release tags following semver patterns (v..) to produce categorized changelog with breaking changes, features, fixes, and contributor attribution.
release
Walk the llmwiki release process step by step.
ship
Ship is the operational release-prep flow for a connected project repo.