Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to NodeSpaceAI/nodespace-core. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/NodeSpaceAI/nodespace-core/main/.claude/commands/pragmatic-code-review.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/NodeSpaceAI/nodespace-coreWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/nodespaceai/nodespace-core/pragmatic-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nodespaceai/nodespace-core/pragmatic-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nodespaceai/nodespace-core/pragmatic-code-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nodespaceai/nodespace-core/pragmatic-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nodespaceai/nodespace-core/pragmatic-code-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00011 | $0.01769 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00708 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00354 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00177 |
Grade A, and why
pragmatic-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 14d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
The source is not reproduced here
A licence we could not identify
The repository carries a LICENSE file, but it is custom or dual enough that GitHub cannot name it and neither can this catalogue. Unknown terms are not permission, so the body is not copied here. Read the licence at the source and decide for yourself.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 14d ago Changed bc92556a04d6
- 1mo ago Changed · -6 lines 1707cc4195ce
- 1mo ago First seen · 180 lines · 11 tokens per session scan A d148c82a7839
pragmatic-code-review is a command published in the GitHub repository NodeSpaceAI/nodespace-core (8 stars, last pushed 2d ago), with no licence file. It adds 11 tokens to every session and 1,769 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
skill-registry
Rebuild the OpenCode skill registry for the current project and installed skills.
skill-creator
Create or update an OpenCode skill using the bundled skill-creator workflow.
cross-critique
Adversarial multi-angle critique. All three auditors fire in parallel (codex=technical, gemini=strategic, claude=ux). Counter-args ranked by rebuttal survival score, not raw severity. Usage: /cross-critique [--with | list | compare].
cross-audit
Second-model review. Picks an auditor (codex/gemini/opencode/aider/copilot), excludes the caller, writes a prompt to paste, reads the response back. Usage: /cross-audit [--with | list | compare].
pr-feedback-ingest
Turn PR feedback (Greptile, CI, bots, humans) into a traceable backlog, so the next step is a narrow implement-approved-slice. Corrective scope only. Use when a PR has review feedback to map to files and slices. Do not use for a new direction or contract (use post-review-pivot), no payload, or task-memory drift only…
repo-consistency-sweep
Defect-class detection for the lower-value half of code review: convention drift, type-safety gaps, security and multi-tenant invariants, operability issues. Runs after review-hard. Checks against a curated bug-class library that grows via pr-feedback-ingest. Use when at least one slice is implemented and you want a…