Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profilesWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles/review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00157 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00063 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00031 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00016 |
Grade A, and why
review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
This is a copy
100% identical to review — 7 lines differ, which has more behind it and is treated as the original. This page carries a canonical link to it rather than competing with it.
What it actually says
Invoke the agent-skills:code-review-and-quality skill.
Review the current changes (staged or recent commits) across all five axes:
- Correctness — Does it match the spec? Edge cases handled? Tests adequate?
- Readability — Clear names? Straightforward logic? Well-organized?
- Architecture — Follows existing patterns? Clean boundaries? Right abstraction level?
- Security — Input validated? Secrets safe? Auth checked? (Use security-and-hardening skill)
- Performance — No N+1 queries? No unbounded ops? (Use performance-optimization skill)
Categorize findings as Critical, Important, or Suggestion. Output a structured review with specific file:line references and fix recommendations.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · -5 lines · -16 tokens per session c26b3b5749fe
- 1mo ago First seen · 17 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 8ad7da75873b
review is a command published in the GitHub repository nota-america/forgecat-agent-profiles (91 stars, last pushed 24d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 157 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. It is 100% identical to review, differing in 7 lines, and is treated as a copy.
Other commands, from other repositories
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
rev
Invoke Code Reviewer for code quality, security, requirements validation, and best practices review.
audit
Run a structured project audit (security / performance / code-review / deploy-checklist / DB-performance / design-review) with FP recheck, allowlist suppression, and a mandatory Council pass.
audit
Adversarial, exhaustive review of the entire repository across code, tests, documentation, and configuration, with optional fixing in the same run. Assumes the code is incorrect until proven otherwise. This is the default command when the invocation names no other.
watch-and-fix
Watch a PR, fix issues from AI reviews, and auto-merge when ready.
review
Perform a thorough code review of specified files or the current diff.