Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to nurettincoban/ai-prd-workflow. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nurettincoban/ai-prd-workflow/main/.claude/commands/workflow-status.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nurettincoban/ai-prd-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/nurettincoban/ai-prd-workflow/workflow-status)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nurettincoban/ai-prd-workflow/workflow-status"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nurettincoban/ai-prd-workflow/workflow-status.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00751 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00376 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00150 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00075 |
Grade A, and why
workflow-status scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
You are guiding a project through an RFC-driven development workflow with these stages:
| # | Stage | Artifact | Command / Prompt |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Create PRD | PRD.md | /create-prd (interactive-prd-creation-prompt.md) |
| 2 | Verify PRD | PRD.md (improved) + PRD-REVIEW.md | /verify-prd (prd-comprehensive-verification-prompt.md) |
| 3 | Extract features | FEATURES.md | /extract-features (prd-to-features-prompt.md) |
| 4 | Generate rules | RULES.md | /generate-rules (prd-to-rules-prompt.md) |
| 5 | Generate RFCs | RFCs/ folder + RFCS.md | /generate-rfcs (prd-to-rfcs-prompt.md) |
| 6 | Testing strategy | TEST-STRATEGY.md | /test-strategy (testing-strategy-prompt.md) |
| 7 | Implement RFCs (one by one, in order) | Code | /implement-rfc <id> (implementation-prompt-template.md) |
| 8 | Review each implementation | reviews/REVIEW-RFC-<id>.md |
/review-rfc <id> (code-review-prompt.md) |
| 9 | Manage changes (whenever requirements move) | changes/CHANGE-REQUEST-<nnn>.md |
/manage-changes (prd-change-management-prompt.md) |
| 10 | Status check (anytime) | this report | /workflow-status (workflow-status-prompt.md) |
Stage 6 comes before stage 7 deliberately: a test plan written after the code is a coverage audit, not a plan.
Inspect the current project to determine workflow progress:
- Which artifacts exist: PRD.md, PRD-REVIEW.md, FEATURES.md, RULES.md, RFCS.md, RFCs/ folder, reviews/, changes/?
- Which RFCs appear implemented in the codebase versus not yet started? Compare each RFC's acceptance criteria against the actual code — do not assume an RFC is done just because code exists.
- Which RFCs have been reviewed? Check
reviews/for a report per implemented RFC — an implemented RFC with no review is the most common real-world gap, and reviews are exactly what gets skipped under deadline. - Are there open change requests in
changes/whose decisions are still pending? - Any signs of drift: code that contradicts the PRD or RULES.md, features in the codebase with no RFC, RFCs skipped out of order?
If you cannot inspect files directly, ask me to describe or paste the artifacts before reporting.
Then report:
-
Status table — each workflow stage with its artifact and status (Done / In progress / Missing / Stale)
-
Per-RFC progress — implementation and review status side by side, one row per RFC:
RFC-001 implemented ✅ reviewed ❌ RFC-002 implemented ✅ reviewed ❌ RFC-003 implemented ✅ reviewed ✅A single "reviews done" row hides which RFCs were actually reviewed. Report them individually.
-
Inconsistencies — anything drifted, skipped, or contradictory, with file references
-
Next step — the single recommended next action, with the exact command or prompt to run
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 46 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 5bfa784f9389
workflow-status is a command published in the GitHub repository nurettincoban/ai-prd-workflow (284 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 751 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
t00-compact
A command that switches replies into an extremely short mode, removing filler and keeping only conclusions, code, numbers, errors, and pending decisions.
enhance-prompt
Command "enhance-prompt" from VoDaiLocz/Enhance-Prompt, covering enhance prompt workflow, 1. intake and scoring (enhance-prompt/skill.md), 5. ambiguity check and 8. iteration (enhance-prompt/references/iteration-mode.md).
paul:progress
Smart status with routing - suggests ONE next action.
statusbar-style
Switch the status-bar style (classic / capsule / hairline).
statusbar
Show current status-bar config and list available styles + themes.
generate-command
Génération Commande Symfony.