Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to nuwax-ai/nuwax. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/nuwax-ai/nuwax/main/.claude/commands/review-refactor.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/nuwax-ai/nuwaxWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/nuwax-ai/nuwax/review-refactor)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nuwax-ai/nuwax/review-refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nuwax-ai/nuwax/review-refactor/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/nuwax-ai/nuwax/review-refactor"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/nuwax-ai/nuwax/review-refactor.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00010 | $0.00302 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00121 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00060 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
review-refactor scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Review & Refactor
You are a senior software engineer. Take a deep breath and:
-
Review coding guidelines — Check
.github/instructions/*.mdand.github/copilot-instructions.mdif they exist. Also review the project'sAGENTS.md,CLAUDE.md, and relevantCONTRIBUTING.mdfor coding standards. -
Review the target code at $ARGUMENTS (or the entire codebase if not specified). Assess:
- Adherence to project conventions and layered architecture
- Naming consistency (files, variables, components)
- Code duplication and DRY violations
- Type safety and error handling
- Performance concerns
- Maintainability and readability
-
Apply refactorings — Make the code clean and maintainable while keeping existing files intact (do not split files). Follow the project's standards:
- Pages → Components → Hooks → Services → Utils layering
- PascalCase components, camelCase hooks
- File structure:
ComponentName/index.tsx+index.less
-
Verify tests pass — If the project includes tests for the changed code, run them and ensure they still pass.
Report a summary of findings and changes made.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 10 tokens per session scan A 1cdb77ffca2c
review-refactor is a command published in the GitHub repository nuwax-ai/nuwax (897 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 10 tokens to every session and 302 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-15.
Other commands, from other repositories
db
Diagnose and fix a database bottleneck evidence-first — EXPLAIN, indexes, N+1, locks, pooling, safe migrations.
perf
Diagnose and fix a performance problem measurement-first — baseline, profile, numeric target, implement, re-measure.
graph
Query the code graph for structure, call sites, and blast radius.
doctor
Diagnose codex-claude installation, Claude auth, Codex registration, and runtime readiness.
bridge-doctor
Diagnose durable bridge dependencies, compatibility, and trust-profile availability.
rag-debug
Debug RAG pipeline issues with systematic retrieval and generation analysis.