Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/o2alexanderfedin/strategic-research-automation-templateWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/o2alexanderfedin/strategic-research-automation-template/compare-sprints)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/o2alexanderfedin/strategic-research-automation-template/compare-sprints"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/o2alexanderfedin/strategic-research-automation-template/compare-sprints/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/o2alexanderfedin/strategic-research-automation-template/compare-sprints"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/o2alexanderfedin/strategic-research-automation-template/compare-sprints.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00009 | $0.00501 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00251 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00100 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
compare-sprints scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 12d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 85 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Compare All Sprints
You are executing the /compare-sprints command to rank and prioritize all opportunities.
Purpose
Compare all executed sprints, rank by opportunity score, identify strategic patterns, and generate prioritization matrix with execution phasing recommendations.
Steps to Execute
Step 1: Discover All Reports
Use Glob to find all files: reports/-report.md Exclude reports/00- (comparative/discovery reports)
Step 2: Extract Key Metrics
For each sprint report, extract:
- Sprint name and number
- Opportunity score (0-100)
- Recommendation tier
- TAM/SAM/SOM estimates
- Timeline to market
- Investment required
- Key differentiators
Step 3: Create Comparison Matrix
Build table with columns:
- Sprint | Name | Score | Rec | TAM | SAM | SOM | Timeline | Investment | Priority
Step 4: Rank by Composite Score
Sort opportunities by opportunity score (highest first). Identify strategic themes and synergies. Group complementary opportunities.
Step 5: Generate 4-Tier Prioritization
Tier 1 (Execute Immediately): Scores 80-100, high strategic fit Tier 2 (Execute Soon): Scores 65-79, good opportunities Tier 3 (Consider): Scores 50-64, conditional execution Deprioritize: Scores <50, risks outweigh benefits
Step 6: Create Strategic Roadmap
Phase 1 (0-6 months): Tier 1 sprints Phase 2 (6-12 months): Tier 2 sprints Phase 3 (12-24 months): Tier 3 sprints (if conditions met)
Step 7: Write Comparison Report
Create reports/00-cross-sprint-analysis.md with:
- Comparison matrix
- Prioritization tiers
- Strategic roadmap
- Aggregate metrics (total TAM, investment)
- Recommendations and rationale
Step 8: Output Summary
Display top 3 priorities and key insights.
Success Criteria
- All sprint reports analyzed
- Comparison matrix complete
- Prioritization tiers assigned
- Strategic roadmap created
- Comparison report written
Error Handling
If fewer than 2 reports, cannot compare.
Expected Output
User receives comparison report with clear prioritization and strategic guidance.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 12d ago First seen · 85 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A e48c45e4b00d
compare-sprints is a command published in the GitHub repository o2alexanderfedin/strategic-research-automation-template (19 stars, last pushed 9mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 501 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
prp-prd
Interactive PRD generator - problem-first, hypothesis-driven product spec with back-and-forth questioning.
jira
Retrieve a Jira ticket, analyze requirements, update status, or add comments. Uses the jira-integration skill and MCP or REST API.
setup-pm
Configure your preferred package manager (npm/pnpm/yarn/bun).
checkpoint
Create or verify a checkpoint in your workflow.
projects
List known projects and their instinct statistics.
update-counts
Update all hardcoded counts (skills, agents, marketplace repos/skills) across documentation from filesystem.