Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oalders/kitchen-sinkWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/oalders/kitchen-sink/fix-linter-warnings)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/oalders/kitchen-sink/fix-linter-warnings"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/oalders/kitchen-sink/fix-linter-warnings/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/oalders/kitchen-sink/fix-linter-warnings"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/oalders/kitchen-sink/fix-linter-warnings.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00013 | $0.02278 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00006 | $0.01139 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00456 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00228 |
Grade A, and why
fix-linter-warnings scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 352 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Fix Linter Warnings
Overview
When fixing linter issues, use a systematic batch approach that prioritizes code quality over linter satisfaction.
Core principle: Fix 25 issues per iteration. Never make code worse to satisfy the linter - use suppression directives (nolint, eslint-disable, etc.) with clear justifications when appropriate.
When to Use
Use this pattern when:
- Cleaning up existing codebase with many linter warnings
- Working through a backlog of linter issues
- Need to make incremental progress on linter compliance
- Want to maintain code quality while addressing linter feedback
- Each commit should represent a logical unit of work
Don't use when:
- Only a few isolated linter issues (fix directly)
- Linter is reporting genuine bugs (fix immediately, don't batch)
- Working on new code (fix as you write)
The Pattern
1. Run Linter and Identify Issues
# Run your project's linter
<linter-command> 2>&1 | head -100
Analyze output by issue type:
- Style issues (formatting, naming)
- Complexity issues (cyclomatic complexity, function length)
- Security issues
- Performance issues
- Code smell issues (duplication, magic numbers)
2. Categorize and Prioritize
Fix in this order:
-
Quick wins (do these first):
- Formatting issues (run auto-formatter)
- Missing punctuation in comments
- Extract constants for repeated strings/numbers
-
Line length issues:
- Break long lines across multiple lines
- Shorten verbose comments
- Split function signatures
- Split method chains
-
Legitimate suppression cases (use sparingly):
- Complexity that can't be simplified (inherent to domain logic)
- Long functions with comprehensive logic
- Framework constraints that prevent fix (ORM tags, query builders)
3. Fixing Strategy
Strategy A: Direct Fixes
For issues that improve code quality:
// Style: Add punctuation
// Before: Get user returns the user
// After: Get user returns the user.
// Constants: Extract magic values
// Before: if (timeout === 5000) { ... }
// After: const DEFAULT_TIMEOUT = 5000; if (timeout === DEFAULT_TIMEOUT) { ... }
// Line length: Break long signatures
// Before
function processData(input, options, config, callbacks, validators) {
// After
function processData(
input,
options,
config,
callbacks,
validators
) {
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 352 lines · 13 tokens per session scan A 4e1050018309
fix-linter-warnings is a command published in the GitHub repository oalders/kitchen-sink (4 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 13 tokens to every session and 2,278 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
doctor
Diagnosticar y reparar problemas del framework Don Cheli, git y entorno. Usa cuando el usuario dice "doctor", "problemas del framework", "don cheli no funciona", "repair Don Cheli", "debug setup", "setup broken", "framework broken", "reparar entorno". Detecta y repara issues de configuración, git y dependencias…
fix
Universal debugging and fix application with semantic code analysis.
doctor
Badi configuration validation. Checks all Badi components and produces a diagnostic report.
http-service
Build, review or debug a Bun HTTP service. Loads the http-service skill, then works the task through its workflow.
gh-issue-use-cypress
Like /gh-issue-use-browser, but pinned to the Cypress MCP — use when your project runs the Cypress MCP for browser automation. Example — /gh-issue-use-cypress "Composer > Save" saving toasts failure but the record persists.