Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oborchers/fractional-ctoWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/oborchers/fractional-cto/plan-tick)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/oborchers/fractional-cto/plan-tick"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/oborchers/fractional-cto/plan-tick/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/oborchers/fractional-cto/plan-tick"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/oborchers/fractional-cto/plan-tick.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00056 | $0.03696 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00022 | $0.01478 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00011 | $0.00739 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00370 |
Grade A, and why
plan-tick scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 232 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
You are ticking master-plan phases. Two modes:
- Auto mode (no
<phase>arg) — detect the current branch, find the master plan matching it, audit each unticked phase against the working tree + branch diff, tick all phases the auditor verdictsACHIEVED. Conservative — never ticks anUNCERTAINorNOT_ACHIEVEDphase. - Manual override (
<phase>arg supplied) — tick that one phase in the resolved plan without running the auditor.
Both modes are non-interactive. You must not call AskUserQuestion anywhere in this command. If something cannot be resolved deterministically, error with a clear message — never prompt.
Input: $ARGUMENTS
Parse arguments:
- First positional integer → manual override mode, target phase number.
- Second positional path (or first if first arg is a path) → explicit plan file.
- No args → auto mode.
Step 1 — Detect git context
Run a single bash block that captures:
git rev-parse --is-inside-work-tree || { echo "ERROR: not in a git repo"; exit 1; }
ROOT="$(git rev-parse --show-toplevel)"
BRANCH="$(git branch --show-current)"
# Base branch: try origin/HEAD symbolic-ref, fallback to main, then master
BASE="$(git symbolic-ref --short refs/remotes/origin/HEAD 2>/dev/null | sed 's|^origin/||')"
[ -z "$BASE" ] && git rev-parse --verify --quiet origin/main >/dev/null && BASE=main
[ -z "$BASE" ] && git rev-parse --verify --quiet origin/master >/dev/null && BASE=master
[ -z "$BASE" ] && BASE=main
MERGE_BASE="$(git merge-base HEAD "$BASE" 2>/dev/null || git merge-base HEAD "origin/$BASE" 2>/dev/null)"
echo "ROOT=$ROOT"
echo "BRANCH=$BRANCH"
echo "BASE=$BASE"
echo "MERGE_BASE=$MERGE_BASE"
If not in a git repo, error: /planning-tools:plan-tick requires a git repository.
Step 2 — Resolve the plan path
If the user supplied an explicit path argument: validate the file exists; otherwise error with the path.
Else:
- Discover candidate plans. Glob
*.mdunder$ROOT/context/tickets/,$ROOT/docs/plans/,$ROOT/.claude/plans/master/. Filter to files containing## Implementation Phases. - 0 candidates: error with the searched paths.
- 1 candidate: use it.
- 2+ candidates — branch-match selection:
- Normalize the branch name: strip leading
feature/,fix/,chore/,bugfix/,hotfix/; lowercase; replace_and/with-. - For each candidate plan, normalize its basename: strip
-PLAN.mdor.md; lowercase; replace_and/with-. - Find candidates whose normalized basename appears as a substring of the normalized branch name (case + separator insensitive).
- 1 match: use it. Print:
Auto-ticking against <path> (branch <BRANCH> matched). - 2+ matches: pick the most-recently-modified among the matches. Print:
Auto-ticking against <path> (branch <BRANCH> matched ambiguously; picked most-recent). - 0 matches: fall back to the most-recently-modified plan across all candidates. Print:
Auto-ticking against <path> (no branch match; picked most-recent).
- Normalize the branch name: strip leading
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 232 lines · 56 tokens per session scan A 5a30e7036cf9
plan-tick is a command published in the GitHub repository oborchers/fractional-cto (32 stars, last pushed 5d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 56 tokens to every session and 3,696 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-13.
Other commands, from other repositories
merge-conflict-analysis
You are analyzing merge conflicts for PR #${{ pr-number }}.
commit
A command that examines staged Git changes and proposes a commit message using the Conventional Commits format, such as feat, fix, or docs. Git is a tool for tracking changes to code.
release-notes
Generate consistent, well-structured release notes from git history. Triggered on release tags following semver patterns (v..) to produce categorized changelog with breaking changes, features, fixes, and contributor attribution.
repo-audit
Audit a codebase (local or remote GitHub/GitLab) against architecture principles and requirements, surfacing drift, risk, and missing decisions.
pr
Handle the full workflow from current branch state to an open, CI-monitored pull request.
doctor
Diagnosticar y reparar problemas del framework Don Cheli, git y entorno. Usa cuando el usuario dice "doctor", "problemas del framework", "don cheli no funciona", "repair Don Cheli", "debug setup", "setup broken", "framework broken", "reparar entorno". Detecta y repara issues de configuración, git y dependencias…