Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/obto-inc/platformWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/obto-inc/platform/start)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/obto-inc/platform/start"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/obto-inc/platform/start/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/obto-inc/platform/start"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/obto-inc/platform/start.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00019 | $0.00705 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00008 | $0.00282 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00141 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00071 |
Grade A, and why
start scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Initiate an OBTO working session. Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
This plugin configures one OBTO MCP server — obto (app.obto.co), the OBTO platform cluster.
Steps:
-
Call
obto_whoami. Report back: identity,identityDomain(the identity's own tenant), the connection's defaultdomain,serverVersion, and the available apps. If the call fails with an auth error, tell the user to approve the OAuth prompt for the server in their browser — Google sign-in; a first-time sign-in provisions their workspace automatically; authorize once and it's remembered.First-connect triage — if sign-in doesn't complete, match the symptom before retrying blindly:
- 401 / any auth error on a tool call — the connection isn't authorized yet. Approve the OAuth prompt in the browser; that is the whole fix.
- 400 saying PKCE is mandatory — the client must send
code_challengewithcode_challenge_method=S256. Every current Claude and Codex build does, so this points at an outdated or hand-rolled client, not at the user's account. - "Failed to check authorization requirements" on the sign-in page — the login page flattening an upstream 400, usually the PKCE rule above or a
redirect_urithat was never registered. Retry the connection from the client, not by reloading that page. invalid_redirect_urion registration — thatclient_nameis already registered with a different remote callback. Register under a distinctclient_name, or ask the operator to clear the stale registration.
-
Resolve the WORKING domain, then state the context. For super-users (whoami
crossTenantEnabled: true, server 3.5.26+) the reporteddomainis only the connection vhost's default — NOT a boundary: any active tenant's domain may be passed per call, so one connection serves every tenant on the cluster. If the task names a tenant, confirm its exact slug against whoami'stenantDomainsand use THAT asdomainfor the whole task — a typo'd slug is refused withunknown_domain+didYouMean. If the tenant is ambiguous, ask the user. Regular users are pinned to their own domain (cross_tenant_not_allowed). Then state the working context in one line — the working domain, and that every subsequent tool call carriesappName+domainexplicitly (the server is stateless; there is no active app). -
Load the matching skill before touching anything: building/deploying ⇒
obto-build-loop/obto-deploy; local media or large files ⇒obto-upload; publishing per-tenant MCP tools/resources/prompts ⇒obto-mcp-extend; remembering/recalling context ⇒obto-memory; anything failing ⇒obto-troubleshooting. If a fix ever seems to need infrastructure — a pod recycle,kubectl, a shell, a DNS console — loadobto-platform-boundaryinstead: that boundary is not crossed, and what MCP cannot fix is reported as a platform defect.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago Changed · +6 lines 68b03a71f9a6
- 1mo ago First seen · 15 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 7cb783e60d16
start is a command published in the GitHub repository obto-inc/platform (1 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 705 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
edit-with-pattern
Edit a file using toolkit design-pattern guidance and review the result.
build
Build a new Lovable app from a prompt and optionally deploy it.
db
Provision or query a Lovable project's Cloud (Postgres) database.
iterate
Send a change request to a Lovable project's agent and review the diff.
domains
Apply the CLI runtime and safety contract before executing a command. Runtime --help is authoritative.
review-epo-claims
Analyze patent claims for EPO Art. 84 EPC compliance - clarity, conciseness, support by description.