Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OdinMB/ops-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/odinmb/ops-workflow/find-all)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/odinmb/ops-workflow/find-all"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/odinmb/ops-workflow/find-all/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/odinmb/ops-workflow/find-all"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/odinmb/ops-workflow/find-all.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00030 | $0.00619 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00012 | $0.00248 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00124 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00062 |
Grade A, and why
find-all scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 9d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 48 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Find All
Run both finder agents in parallel, then brief the user on what the project's gaps mean. Discovery only — no plans, no execution, and the survey list is the only file it writes.
Step 1: Spawn Both Finders in Parallel
Launch two sub-agents simultaneously:
Task finder — spawn with subagent_type: "ops:task-finder" and this prompt:
Scan depth: full
This is a discovery scan. Do NOT add anything to the backlog, and do NOT write a
follow-up file — return every item you find in your response, with your usual
fields, and let the caller decide what to persist.
Opps finder — spawn with subagent_type: "ops:opps-finder" and this prompt:
Your job: identify the new directions of work genuinely worth exploring
(often 3-5; fewer or none is a valid result).
Stay grounded in the project's goals in charter.md and its limitations in MEMORY.md.
Every suggestion must be something an autonomous agent can start working on.
Step 2: Consolidate and Present
Once both agents complete, brief the user on what the two scans add up to.
Format
No tables. Present 3-6 themes, grouped by what they mean for the project rather than by which finder produced them — e.g. "nobody has checked whether the two biggest funders still take unsolicited applications", "the audience numbers everything else rests on are six months stale". Each theme gets a short paragraph: what is missing or going stale, what it costs to leave it alone, and — where there is a real choice — two directions with what each buys and gives up. Effort labels, lens names, per-item file paths, and the agents' own count lines stay out. Close with the two or three you would start with and why, then ask which to pursue — and where the answer depends on what the user wants the project to achieve, ask that instead of guessing.
Nothing gets dropped: write the complete item list, with the finders' own fields, to plans/YYYY-MM-DD_survey.md — a findings list, not a plan — for whoever plans from it later, and mention that file in one line.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 9d ago Changed 8396a0144a37
- 10d ago Changed 2f72d56be8b9
- 11d ago Changed · -3 lines e1e1e9eb3b26
- 2mo ago First seen · 51 lines · 30 tokens per session scan A 1f452f5c24de
find-all is a command published in the GitHub repository OdinMB/ops-workflow (6 stars, last pushed 10d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 30 tokens to every session and 619 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
find-all compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| find-allOdinMB/ops-workflow | Command | 6 | 10d ago | MIT | A | 30 | Claude Code |
| forge-compact-taskluiseiman/dotforge | Command | 8 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 46 | Claude Code |
| forge-bootstrapluiseiman/dotforge | Command | 8 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 20 | Claude Code |
| forge-insightsluiseiman/dotforge | Command | 8 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 16 | Claude Code |
| capluiseiman/dotforge | Command | 8 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 19 | Claude Code |
| forge-auditluiseiman/dotforge | Command | 8 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 17 | Claude Code |
| forge-captureluiseiman/dotforge | Command | 8 | 2d ago | MIT | A | 20 | Claude Code |