Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/oghie/skillsets/concurrency-code-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/oghie/skillsetsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/oghie/skillsets/concurrency-code-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/oghie/skillsets/concurrency-code-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/oghie/skillsets/concurrency-code-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00176 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00088 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00035 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00018 |
Grade A, and why
concurrency-code-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Concurrency Code Review Command
Goal
Review code for races, deadlocks, starvation, lost signals, unsafe message passing, and unbounded blocking.
Procedure
- List execution units and shared state.
- Run
scripts/concurrency_static_scan.py <path>. - Inspect lock/semaphore/condition ownership manually.
- Search for sleeps, blocking calls, logging, allocation, and remote calls inside critical sections.
- Search for non-blocking operations and verify completion before buffer reuse.
- Identify one plausible bad interleaving for each risky area.
- Recommend the smallest protocol change that restores the violated property.
Output
- Findings first, ordered by severity.
- File and line references.
- Violated property: safety, liveness, fairness, bounded blocking, or deadline.
- Suggested fix.
- Tests or traces required.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 21 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A c56b8da46fd5
concurrency-code-review is a command published in the GitHub repository oghie/skillsets (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 176 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
ars-lit-review
ARS academic-paper lit-review mode — annotated bibliography in paper format.
ars-plan
ARS academic-paper plan mode — Socratic chapter-by-chapter planning.
ars-revision-coach
ARS academic-paper revision-coach — peer-review roadmap or source-accounted real-committee response skeleton.
ars-3w
ARS deep-research three-way-scan mode — WHY / HOW / WHAT paper comparison.
ars-citation-check
ARS academic-paper citation-check mode — citation error report.
analyze-writing
Analyze academic writing quality of the current draft. Checks for passive voice overuse, weak openings, hedging balance, readability, sentence length variation, and word repetitions. Produces a writing quality report with specific improvement suggestions per section.