Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/okminlee/everything-claude-code-ios/swift-reviewgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OkminLee/everything-claude-code-iosWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/okminlee/everything-claude-code-ios/swift-review)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/okminlee/everything-claude-code-ios/swift-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/okminlee/everything-claude-code-ios/swift-review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00027 | $0.00991 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00495 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00198 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00099 |
Grade A, and why
swift-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 164 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Swift Code Review
Comprehensive security and quality review of uncommitted changes for iOS projects.
This command invokes the swift-code-reviewer agent.
Process
-
Get changed files:
git diff --name-only HEAD -
For each changed Swift file, check for:
Security Issues (CRITICAL):
- Sensitive data in UserDefaults (use Keychain)
- Hardcoded credentials, API keys, tokens
- App Transport Security (ATS) exceptions without justification
- Missing certificate pinning for financial/health apps
- Biometric auth bypass vulnerabilities
- Clipboard exposure of sensitive data
- Debug code in production (#if DEBUG missing)
- WebView JavaScript injection risks
Memory Management (CRITICAL):
- Retain cycles in closures (missing
[weak self]) - Delegates not declared as
weak - NotificationCenter observers not removed
- Timer not invalidated on deinit
- URLSession tasks not cancelled
- Combine:
sinkwithout storing cancellable - Combine:
assign(to:on:)creating retain cycle
Code Quality (HIGH):
- Force unwrapping (!) without guard/if-let
- Functions exceeding 40 lines
- Files exceeding 500 lines
- Nesting depth exceeding 4 levels
- Missing access control (private by default)
print()statements in production code- TODO/FIXME comments
- Missing documentation for public APIs
- Empty catch blocks
try!ortry?without justification
Concurrency (HIGH):
- UI updates not on main thread
- Missing
@MainActorfor ViewModel - Data races in shared mutable state
- Actor isolation violations
- Sendable compliance issues
- Task cancellation not handled
Best Practices (MEDIUM):
- Not using struct for data models (prefer value types)
- Missing SwiftUI previews for views
- Accessibility identifiers missing
- Missing tests for new code
- Hardcoded strings (should be localized)
- Magic numbers without constants
- Generate report with:
- Severity: 🔴 CRITICAL, 🟡 HIGH, 🟢 MEDIUM
- File location:
path/to/file.swift:lineNumber - Issue description
- Code example of the problem
- Suggested fix with code
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 6d ago First seen · 164 lines · 27 tokens per session scan A 7213e5afc278
swift-review is a command published in the GitHub repository OkminLee/everything-claude-code-ios (58 stars, last pushed 5mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 27 tokens to every session and 991 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
constitution
Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.