Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ololand-ai/ololand-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/ic-approve-readiness)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/ic-approve-readiness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/ic-approve-readiness/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/ic-approve-readiness"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/ic-approve-readiness.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00037 | $0.00965 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00018 | $0.00483 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00193 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00004 | $0.00097 |
Grade A, and why
ic-approve-readiness scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 66 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
IC Approve Readiness
IC package approval is gated by two independent blocker tiers:
- Open blocking assumptions — high or critical tracked assumptions still in an unresolved state.
- Unsupported high-priority assumptions — high or critical tracked assumptions whose evidence_strength is
none(no provenance attached at all).
A separate weak-evidence warning surface flags high/critical assumptions whose evidence_strength is weak or partial. These do NOT block approval, but the IC viewer surfaces them so the analyst knows what to defend.
This command runs the pre-flight check before the analyst attempts to approve.
Usage
/ic-approve-readiness <deal_id>
Arguments
deal_id(required) — The deal whose IC package readiness to assess.
Execution
-
Call
get_assumption_control_summarywith thedeal_id. -
Call
get_assumption_evidence_packto retrievequality_flagsfor the deal. -
Call
get_ic_package(deal_id)to retrieve the latest IC package and itsapproval_evidence_snapshot. If the response haspackage: null, no IC package exists yet — note this and continue with just the assumption-level analysis. -
Categorize:
- Tier-1 blockers (resolution required): from
control_summary.blocking_assumptions— high/critical, status not in {verified, mitigated, invalidated, accepted}. - Tier-2 blockers (provenance required): from
quality_flags— high/critical tracked assumptions withevidence_strength == "none". - Warnings (review recommended, not blocking): from
quality_flags— high/critical tracked assumptions withevidence_strengthin {weak, partial}. Cross-reference these againstapproval_evidence_snapshot.warningsif a package exists.
- Tier-1 blockers (resolution required): from
-
Render:
- Overall readiness: READY / BLOCKED
- Tier-1 blockers (one row per blocker):
assumption_id,statement,status,priority, recommended resolution - Tier-2 blockers (unsupported high-priority):
assumption_id,statement,missing_links, recommended source to attach - Warnings (weak/partial evidence):
assumption_id,statement,evidence_strength, why this is weak, what to add to strengthen it - Counts:
total,open,blocking, byevidence_strength - Package state (if a package exists):
version,status,approved_at, andapproval_evidence_snapshot.summary— the snapshot that was captured at the last approval attempt or will be captured next.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 66 lines · 37 tokens per session scan A 1f52817821b9
ic-approve-readiness is a command published in the GitHub repository ololand-ai/ololand-plugins (0 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 37 tokens to every session and 965 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
valuation-methods
Valuation methods analysis — multiples, DCF inputs, PEG integration, valuation assumption extraction.
merit-reconcile
Preview or check the status of Stripe → Merit payout reconciliation (read-only).
audit-checklist
Perform an internal audit, review controls, or prepare for an external financial audit.
scan
Scan AWS account for cost optimization.
finops-status
Orientation — say where an opportunity or assignment sits in the five-step FinOps lifecycle and what unlocks next. Useful when a record has no active stage: an opportunity while its assignments do the work, an assignment whose plan has not been approved yet, or a rejected or archived assignment. Read-only; mutates…
audit
Scan for non-kernel money math. Rebuild critical flows as JournalEntrys. Replay and prove. Complements /ledger-verify.