plan

A planning command for OloLand deal questions. It asks a planner agent to turn a question into proposed steps, open questions, escalation status, reasoning, and an estimate of tool calls before execution.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it before a non-trivial deal question to create a plan tied to a deal and conversation session, then decide whether to approve it.
Why use it?
It lets users review and approve the intended research path before the executor runs tools or searches documents. This can expose missing information or an unsuitable plan early.

Command

Part of the ololand-dd plugin — 47 commands, 3 agents shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/plan
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins

Or install ololand-dd, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 47 commands, 3 agents.

Per session 50 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 985 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00050 $0.00985
Opus 5 $0.00025 $0.00492
Sonnet 5 $0.00010 $0.00197
Haiku 4.5 $0.00005 $0.00098

Measured 2d ago against content hash 761260b87691, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

plan scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/ololand-dd/commands/plan.md · 77 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 77 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

/plan

You are running OloLand's planner agent in plan-mode. The planner reads the user's question, the active deal context, and produces a structured PlanResponse (steps, open_questions, escalation_required, reasoning, estimated tool calls) — without running any tools, doing any document search, or escalating to templates. It's a single Flash-class call; cheap relative to the executor run that follows.

Required inputs

  1. deal_id — the deal the conversation is about.
  2. session_id — an active ADK conversation session. If the user doesn't have one, call mcp__ololand__create_conversation_session(deal_id) first and use the returned id.
  3. message — the user's question that the planner should plan for. Quote it verbatim — don't paraphrase.

Action

Call mcp__ololand__submit_plan_for_approval with the three inputs.

Output

Render the plan in this shape:

Proposed plan for: "<message>"

Steps
  1. <step.title> — <step.description>
     Tools: <step.tools (if any)>
  2. ...

Open questions
  - <q1>
  - ...

Estimated tool calls: <n>
Escalation required: <true|false>
Reasoning: <reasoning>

Then ask the user:

Approve this plan? Reply "yes" to approve the handoff, "no" to adjust, or rewrite any step. A same-chat "yes" records intent only; it does not execute the plan. Execution requires continuing this same session in OloLand's first-party app or normal session endpoint with the returned plan payload supplied as approved_plan.

On approval, continue the same session through OloLand's first-party app or normal SSE/message endpoint, attaching the returned plan payload in the approved_plan field of SubmitMessageRequest. This field supplies execution context; it is not currently a persisted or hash-validated approval identity, so do not describe the handoff as tamper-proof or cryptographically bound. The external MCP ask_deal_agent and talk_to_deal tools do not currently accept the normal endpoint's approved_plan field; do not call them for the planned execution, and do not treat quoted plan prose or a conversational "yes" as a substitute for that binding. If the current client cannot send approved_plan through the normal session endpoint, stop and report that governed execution is unavailable on this rail.

Read the full file on GitHub · 77 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2d ago First seen · 77 lines · 50 tokens per session scan A 761260b87691

Subscribe to this mod's changes

plan is a command published in the GitHub repository ololand-ai/ololand-plugins (0 stars, last pushed 6d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 50 tokens to every session and 985 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.