Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ololand-ai/ololand-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/replay-run)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/replay-run"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/ololand-ai/ololand-plugins/replay-run.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00064 | $0.00924 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00032 | $0.00462 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00185 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00092 |
Grade A, and why
replay-run scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 8d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 65 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/replay-run
You are enqueueing a replay of an existing OloLand agent run. The original run's root_prompt_snapshot is replayed against either the current harness + skill catalog (current_skills) or the original methodology bytes (byte_for_byte).
This command requires admin or compliance role. Non-privileged users will get error_code: "insufficient_role".
Required inputs
- run_id — the agent_runs row to replay. Confirm from the user that this is the run they want replayed; replays cost credits and a Celery worker.
Optional:
- mode —
current_skills(default) orbyte_for_byte. See "When to use which mode" below. - comment — short reviewer note stored on the replay (e.g. "Re-run after grader fix 2026-05-17"). Strongly recommended for audit trail.
Action
-
(Optional but recommended) Call
mcp__ololand__get_agent_runfirst to confirm the run is replayable. The user should see at least:agent_name,model_version,status,started_at,entry_point. Ifroot_prompt_snapshotis not present, the replay will fail witherror_code: "no_snapshot"— surface that pre-emptively. -
Call
mcp__ololand__replay_agent_runwithrun_id,mode, optionalcomment. -
On success, surface:
Replay queued Replay run id: <replay_run_id> Parent run id: <parent_run_id> Status: queued Compare: <comparison_url>Tell the user to poll
mcp__ololand__get_agent_run <replay_run_id>for completion. Typical end-to-end latency: 30–180 seconds depending on the original run's iteration count. -
On error, surface the
error_codeverbatim and the explanation:not_found— wrong run_id.access_denied— run belongs to a different company.insufficient_role— user is not admin/compliance.no_snapshot— original run pre-dates snapshot capture (pre-2026-05-14 runs).bad_request— invalid mode.dispatch_failed— Celery rejection; the replay row is marked error.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 8d ago First seen · 65 lines · 64 tokens per session scan A c6b1568429a1
replay-run is a command published in the GitHub repository ololand-ai/ololand-plugins (0 stars, last pushed 4d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 64 tokens to every session and 924 once invoked, about $0.0003 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.