Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/omermaksutii/rugproof/cardgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/omermaksutii/RugProofWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/omermaksutii/rugproof/card)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/omermaksutii/rugproof/card"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/omermaksutii/rugproof/card.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00019 | $0.00527 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00010 | $0.00264 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00105 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00053 |
Grade A, and why
card scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/card — shareable PNG audit card
Renders a 1200×1200 PNG (Twitter/X-card friendly) with the audit summary.
What's on the card
- Contract name + (truncated) address
- Letter grade (A+ → F), prominently
- Severity counts: ⛔ Critical · ⚠ High · ⚡ Medium · ◌ Low
- Top finding title (one-liner)
- Date + chain (if from
/audit-live) - "Audited by Rugproof" branding mark
- QR code linking to the full report URL (if public gallery enabled)
Procedure
- Pull the latest audit summary.
- Pick the style from
$ARGUMENTS --styleor.rugproof.yml report.audit_card.style. Defaultclassic.classic— clean, professional, dark gradientbear— Berachain-themed, ursine mascot in corner (homage to the chain)hacker— green-on-black terminal aestheticminimal— single grade letter on white, smallest text
- Render the SVG template (
templates/audit-card.svg.hbs) with the data. - Convert SVG → PNG using
resvg(preferred, no headless browser) orsharpfallback. - Output to
--outorrugproof-reports/audit-card-<date>.png.
Output
Audit card written: rugproof-reports/audit-card-2026-05-12.png
Dimensions: 1200×1200
Style: bear
Grade: B
Findings: 0C / 2H / 4M / 7L
Share on Twitter? Run:
/card --share twitter
Public gallery
If .rugproof.yml report.audit_card.public_gallery_submit: true, also POST the card + audit JSON to the gallery API. Returns a permalink URL the user can include in tweets.
Notes
- The card is the viral output. Make it look great. Borrow visual language from CTF badges and game leaderboards.
- The grade letter is the largest element. Don't hide it.
- Don't include the user's private code in the card. Public-safe data only.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 55 lines · 19 tokens per session scan A 28042f026632
card is a command published in the GitHub repository omermaksutii/RugProof (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 19 tokens to every session and 527 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
krait-fuzz
Run an invariant-based fuzzing campaign: Understand → Extract Invariants → Generate Foundry Tests → Run & Fix Iteratively → Report.
krait-poc
Write and run a valid Foundry proof-of-concept that proves (or disproves) a Solidity exploit by asserting the actual harm on a forked chain or against local source.
krait-quick
Run a streamlined audit: Recon → Detection → Verification → Report. Skips state inconsistency analysis and cross-feed iteration for speed.
fix-btc-e2e-p11
Fix errors in BTC E2E test (Pattern 11: P2TR Tapscript M-of-N).
fix-btc-e2e-p2
Fix errors in BTC E2E test (Pattern 2: P2PKH 2-of-3 Multisig).
fix-bch-e2e-p3
Fix errors in BCH E2E test (Pattern 3: P2SH 3-of-3 Multisig).