Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/omermaksutii/rugproof/remediategit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/omermaksutii/RugProofWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/omermaksutii/rugproof/remediate)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/omermaksutii/rugproof/remediate"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/omermaksutii/rugproof/remediate.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00023 | $0.00606 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00012 | $0.00303 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00121 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00061 |
Grade A, and why
remediate scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 64 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/remediate — write the fix
For each finding ID in $ARGUMENTS, produce a concrete code patch.
Procedure
Step 1 — Resolve finding(s)
Pull the finding(s) from the most recent audit. If not available, ask the user to re-run /audit or pipe in a findings.json.
Step 2 — Dispatch remediation-suggester subagent
For each finding, the subagent:
- Reads the affected file and the relevant skill from
skills/ - Generates the fix as a unified diff against the file
- Cross-references known-good implementations (OZ, Solady) for the canonical fix shape
- Adds a
// rugproof: fixed REENT-001comment? No — do not add comments about the fix. Just fix it. (CLAUDE.md rule: no "fixed X" comments.)
Step 3 — Validate the patch
Before output:
- Check the patch compiles (run
forge buildif Foundry project). - Run any existing tests (
forge testornpm test) to make sure the fix doesn't break them. - Re-run the relevant vuln skill against the patched file — confirm the finding is gone.
Step 4 — Output
Remediation for REENT-001:
--- a/src/Vault.sol
+++ b/src/Vault.sol
@@ -140,10 +140,10 @@ function withdraw() external {
- uint256 amt = balance[msg.sender];
- (bool ok,) = msg.sender.call{value: amt}("");
- require(ok);
- balance[msg.sender] = 0;
+ uint256 amt = balance[msg.sender];
+ balance[msg.sender] = 0;
+ (bool ok,) = msg.sender.call{value: amt}("");
+ require(ok, "withdraw failed");
}
Verification:
forge build: ✓
forge test: 12 passing, 0 failing
re-audit: REENT-001 no longer reported
If --apply flag passed, also apply the patch to the file in place. Otherwise just print it.
Notes
- One patch per finding by default. If multiple findings are in the same function, you may combine them in one diff with a clear note.
- If the fix requires architectural change (e.g. "move from push to pull payments"), the patch may span multiple files. Tell the user.
- Never add comments to the patched code beyond what was there.
- If the fix isn't safely automatable (e.g. needs a multi-sig deployment), output advice instead of a diff.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 4d ago First seen · 64 lines · 23 tokens per session scan A 518c225d3044
remediate is a command published in the GitHub repository omermaksutii/RugProof (9 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 23 tokens to every session and 606 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
phase6-start
Command "phase6-start" from kota1026/quantum-shield, covering phase 6 $arguments 開始, step 1: 進捗状況を確認, step 2: 未完了画面を特定, step 3: 必須ファイルを読み込む and step 4: インフラ確認.
codespace-verify
Command "codespace-verify" from kota1026/quantum-shield, covering codespaces ui確認コマンド, 1. codespaces起動確認, サービス起動状態確認, postgresql, redis, rabbitmqが起動していない場合 and フロントエンド起動.
pr-merge
Command "pr-merge" from kota1026/quantum-shield, covering pr作成・マージコマンド, 1. 変更確認, 2. コミット(未コミットがある場合), 3. pr作成 and 4. マージ.
krait
Run a complete multi-phase security audit on the target codebase.
krait-fuzz
Run an invariant-based fuzzing campaign: Understand → Extract Invariants → Generate Foundry Tests → Run & Fix Iteratively → Report.
dashboard
Open the ChainGPT marketplace dashboard (localhost web UI — Overview, Skills, Activity, Health, About).