Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/ooiyeefei/ccc/prdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/ooiyeefei/cccWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00498 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00004 | $0.00249 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00002 | $0.00100 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00050 |
Grade A, and why
prd scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
PRD Generation
Generate Product Requirements Document for $ARGUMENTS and create GitHub Issue.
Prerequisites
-
Check GitHub CLI:
gh auth status -
Check for existing context in:
.pm/gaps/*.md(for WINNING score).pm/competitors/*.md(for competitive evidence)
Process
Use the prd-generator agent for comprehensive PRD:
-
Gather Context
- Load gap analysis data for $ARGUMENTS if exists
- Load competitor implementations
- Ask user for additional requirements if needed
-
Deduplication Check
gh issue list --search "$ARGUMENTS" --label "pm:feature-request" --json number,titleIf similar issue exists (>70% match):
- Show existing issue
- Ask: "Update existing or create new?"
-
Generate PRD with sections:
- Problem Statement
- User Stories
- Competitive Analysis
- Requirements (Functional, Non-Functional)
- Acceptance Criteria (P0/P1/P2)
- Edge Cases
- Out of Scope
- Technical Considerations
- Success Metrics
-
Save PRD
- Create
.pm/prds/directory if not exists - Save to
.pm/prds/[feature-slug].md
- Create
-
Create GitHub Issue
gh issue create \ --title "Feature: $ARGUMENTS" \ --body "$(cat .pm/prds/[feature-slug].md)" \ --label "pm:feature-request" \ --label "[winning-label]" \ --label "[priority-label]" -
Update Tracking
- Save issue reference to
.pm/requests/[issue-number].md - Update
.pm/cache/last-updated.json
- Save issue reference to
-
Return Results
- PRD file location
- GitHub Issue URL
- Next steps:
/speckit.specify #[issue-number]
If gh CLI Unavailable
Output PRD formatted for manual GitHub issue creation.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 76 lines · 8 tokens per session scan A 3b810f504956
prd is a command published in the GitHub repository ooiyeefei/ccc (483 stars, last pushed 1mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 8 tokens to every session and 498 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
constitution
Create or update the project constitution from interactive or provided principle inputs.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.