Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/opencue/cuecardsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/opencue/cuecards/audit-geo)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/opencue/cuecards/audit-geo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/opencue/cuecards/audit-geo/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/opencue/cuecards/audit-geo"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/opencue/cuecards/audit-geo.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00024 | $0.00637 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00255 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00127 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00064 |
Grade A, and why
audit-geo scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 61 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/audit-geo — GEO Health Check for cuecards
Audit cuecards' Generative Engine Optimisation (GEO) layer for accuracy and completeness. GEO = making Cue easy for ChatGPT, Perplexity, Google AI Overviews, and similar systems to understand, summarise, and cite correctly.
What to check
1. llms.txt accuracy (root)
- Version/install command is current:
grep "npm install" llms.txtmatches current npm package - Supported agent count matches
docs/llms-full.txt
2. web/public/llms.txt accuracy
- Consistent with root
llms.txt - All linked GitHub URLs resolve (spot-check 3)
3. content/geo/entity-profile.json
- Valid JSON:
python3 -m json.tool content/geo/entity-profile.json > /dev/null @typeincludesSoftwareApplicationfeatureListcount ≥ 8keywordslist ≥ 8 termsdescriptionfield matches README tagline (no drift)
4. content/geo/brand-facts.md
- Agent count in "Supported agents" section matches
docs/llms-full.txt - Install commands are syntactically valid bash
- Token cost claim (10–25×) matches README claim
5. content/geo/answer-engine-faq.md
- Every answer is ≥ 2 sentences (too short = not citation-worthy)
- Install commands match current
package.jsonpackage name - No questions reference outdated file names (e.g.
.cue-profileshould now be.cue.profile)
6. content/geo/ai-discovery-map.yml
- All
url:values use the correct GitHub org (opencue/cuecards) - No dead paths referenced (check
do_not_scrapelist is still accurate)
7. Consistency cross-check
- Product name: "cuecards" (lowercase) used consistently — not "CUE" or "Cue" as primary
- npm package:
cue-aiconsistent across all geo files - Repository:
https://github.com/opencue/cuecardsconsistent
Report format
| File | Status | Issues |
|---|---|---|
| llms.txt (root) | ✅/❌ | ... |
| web/public/llms.txt | ✅/❌ | ... |
| entity-profile.json | ✅/❌ | ... |
| brand-facts.md | ✅/❌ | ... |
| answer-engine-faq.md | ✅/❌ | ... |
| ai-discovery-map.yml | ✅/❌ | ... |
| Cross-file consistency | ✅/❌ | ... |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 61 lines · 24 tokens per session scan A e9b610f6da53
audit-geo is a command published in the GitHub repository opencue/cuecards (7 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 24 tokens to every session and 637 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
audit-geo compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| audit-geoopencue/cuecards | Command | 7 | yesterday | MIT | A | 24 | Claude Code |
| agentloop-audit-queryalibaba/loongsuite-pilot | Command | 239 | yesterday | Apache-2.0 | A | 5 | Claude Code |
| atomic-helpdamusix/atomic-claude | Command | 115 | 5d ago | MIT | A | 57 | Claude Code |
| atomic-plandamusix/atomic-claude | Command | 115 | 5d ago | MIT | A | 54 | Claude Code |
| follow-updamusix/atomic-claude | Command | 115 | 5d ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| documentationdamusix/atomic-claude | Command | 115 | 5d ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| watch-cidamusix/atomic-claude | Command | 115 | 5d ago | MIT | A | 69 | Claude Code |