Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to opencue/cuecards. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/opencue/cuecards/main/.claude/commands/generate-llms.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/opencue/cuecardsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/opencue/cuecards/generate-llms)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/opencue/cuecards/generate-llms"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/opencue/cuecards/generate-llms.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00033 | $0.00565 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00016 | $0.00282 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00113 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00056 |
Grade A, and why
generate-llms scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/generate-llms — Regenerate llms.txt Files
Regenerate llms.txt (root) and web/public/llms.txt from current source material.
Run this after any significant change to the README, profiles list, or agent support.
Source files to read first
README.md— product description, tagline, install command, agent listdocs/llms-full.txt— dense technical summary (authoritative)profiles/— list current profiles withls profiles/ | grep -v '^_'package.json— current version and npm package name
Root llms.txt — what it must contain
# cuecards (cue)
<one-paragraph description — from README tagline + what-it-does>
## What it solves
<2–3 sentences on the problem>
## Core docs
- [README](<url>) — <purpose>
- [llms-full.txt](<url>) — <purpose>
- [AGENTS.md](<url>) — <purpose>
- [launch.md](<url>) — <purpose>
## Setup guides
- [macOS](<url>)
- [Linux / WSL2](<url>)
- [Windows](<url>)
## Comparisons
- [cue vs claude-code-switcher](<url>)
- [cue vs skillport](<url>)
- [cue vs Kiro Powers](<url>)
## Repository
- GitHub: https://github.com/opencue/cuecards
- npm: https://www.npmjs.com/package/cue-ai
- License: MIT
web/public/llms.txt — condensed version
Same structure as root llms.txt but:
- Shorter descriptions (1 sentence max per link)
- Point to deployed URLs (
https://opencue.github.io/cuecards/...) where they exist - Include the
## GEO filessection pointing tocontent/geo/
After generating
- Diff the new files against the previous versions:
git diff llms.txt web/public/llms.txt - Verify no URLs were broken (spot-check 3 links)
- Commit as:
docs: refresh llms.txt [skip ci]
Automation note
This command is also triggered by the nightly discover workflow. If running
manually, check the workflow hasn't already run today:
git log --oneline --since="24 hours ago" | grep "llms"
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 67 lines · 33 tokens per session scan A fd18a1babe12
generate-llms is a command published in the GitHub repository opencue/cuecards (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It adds 33 tokens to every session and 565 once invoked, about $0.0002 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
atomic-help
Route a lost user to the right atomic verb, skill, agent, or binary subcommand. Bare invocation reads git state and recommends one next step. Topic keyword or freeform intent → focused pointer. tour → guided walkthrough of the system. Help router, not duplicated docs.
atomic-plan
Write a design doc (concepts, business rules, approaches) and a checkpoint-table spec (contract) for non-trivial work; inline spec only for trivial. Gauges triviality; loops spec authoring with subagents. Human-facing artifact, Mermaid diagrams allowed.
subagent-implementation
Orchestrate implement→review subagent loop until task complete. Reads the approved spec, writes a thin brief to .claude/.scratchpad/, dispatches fresh-context subagents, loops until reviewer signs off, commits per green iteration, then updates repo docs.
follow-up
Review and act on pending reminders. Bare invocation shows all reminders as an indexed list; cron-fired invocation (/follow-up due ) surfaces the specific reminder and waits for a response; /follow-up review lists stale project follow-up entries for per-item disposition (extend/close/promote/skip). Transport-aware…
quick-fix
Run the implement→review subagent loop without the planning phase — for straightforward fixes with a known cause and one obvious approach, regardless of how many files the change spreads across. Skips the spec gate, worktree gate, and finalize ceremony (implementation log, docs, signals) that /subagent-implementation…
documentation
Bootstrap and maintain project documentation surfaces. Two modes: bootstrap (discover doc files, index them in CLAUDE.md) and authoring (scan for unindexed docs, match diff against indexed surfaces, walk stale/incomplete/missing items with Yes/Later/Remind/Skip).