planning

planning is a command for Claude Code from OpenRaiser/NanoResearch. It costs 0 tokens per session (1,483 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A research-planning command for NanoResearch that turns a selected research idea into an experiment blueprint. It covers datasets, comparison methods, and experiment setup.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to choose public datasets, define preprocessing, select baseline methods, and plan experiments for comparing research approaches.
Why use it?
It organizes the preparation needed to test a research hypothesis and identifies missing prerequisites, such as the required ideation file.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: $ARGUMENTS substitution.

Good fit Use it to choose public datasets, define preprocessing, select baseline methods, and plan experiments for comparing research approaches.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/openraiser/nanoresearch/planning
About the project

NanoResearch is an autonomous AI research system that turns research ideas into executable experiments and LaTeX papers supported by results from real training runs. It is for researchers validating prototypes, running GPU experiments, generating benchmarks, analyzing logs, and preparing paper drafts. The catalogue add-ons support its research pipeline and agent workflows.

OpenRaiser/NanoResearch · 1,332 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OpenRaiser/NanoResearch

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for planning

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/openraiser/nanoresearch/planning/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/openraiser/nanoresearch/planning)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/openraiser/nanoresearch/planning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/openraiser/nanoresearch/planning/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for planning

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/openraiser/nanoresearch/planning"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/openraiser/nanoresearch/planning.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 1,483 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00000 $0.01483
Opus 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00593
Sonnet 5.5 $0.00000 $0.00297
Haiku 4.5 $0.00000 $0.00148

Measured 2mo ago against content hash 2c13fb4b3a68, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

planning scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/planning.md · 198 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 198 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Planning — Experiment Blueprint Design

You are the Planning Agent for NanoResearch. Your job is to design a detailed experiment blueprint from the ideation output.

Input

$ARGUMENTS — workspace path (optional). If not provided, use the most recent workspace under ~/.nanoresearch/workspace/research/.

Prerequisites

Read {workspace}/papers/ideation_output.json. If it doesn't exist, tell the user to run /project:ideation first.

Process

Update manifest: set planning stage to "running".

Step 1: Parse Hypothesis

Extract the selected hypothesis, its rationale, and key references from the ideation output.

Step 2: Dataset Selection

Identify 1-3 publicly available datasets suitable for validating the hypothesis:

  • Use WebSearch to verify dataset availability and download URLs
  • Specify: name, source URL, size, splits (train/val/test), preprocessing steps
  • Prefer well-known benchmark datasets that enable comparison with baselines

Step 3: Baseline Methods

Select 2-4 baseline methods from the surveyed literature:

  • At least one classic/simple baseline
  • At least one recent state-of-the-art method
  • For each: name, reference paper, key idea, expected performance level

Step 4: Evaluation Metrics

Define primary and secondary metrics:

  • Primary: the main metric for comparing methods (e.g., accuracy, F1, BLEU)
  • Secondary: additional metrics that provide complementary insights
  • For each: name, definition, why it's appropriate

Step 5: Ablation Design

Design ablation groups that isolate each novel component:

  • Each ablation removes or replaces one component of the proposed method
  • Specify: group name, what's changed, expected effect
  • Include at least 3 ablation variants

Step 6: Resource Estimation

Estimate computational requirements:

  • GPU type and count needed
  • Estimated training time per experiment
  • Total GPU-hours
  • Storage requirements

Output

Write to {workspace}/plans/experiment_blueprint.json:

{
  "hypothesis": {
    "id": "H1",
    "title": "...",
    "description": "..."
  },
  "datasets": [
    {
      "name": "Dataset Name",
      "source": "URL or reference",
      "size": "10K samples",
      "splits": {"train": 8000, "val": 1000, "test": 1000},
      "preprocessing": ["tokenize", "normalize", "..."]
    }
  ],
  "baselines": [
    {
      "name": "Baseline Name",
      "reference": "Author et al., 2024",
      "description": "Key idea",
      "expected_performance": "~85% accuracy"
    }
  ],
  "proposed_method": {
    "name": "Our Method",
    "description": "Detailed description of the proposed approach",
    "key_components": ["component1", "component2"],
    "novelty": "What makes this different from baselines"
  },
  "metrics": {
    "primary": [{"name": "Accuracy", "definition": "..."}],
    "secondary": [{"name": "F1-macro", "definition": "..."}]
  },
  "ablations": [
    {
      "name": "w/o Component A",
      "description": "Remove component A",
      "expected_effect": "Performance drop of ~5%"
    }
  ],
  "resources": {
    "gpu_type": "A100",
    "gpu_count": 1,
    "estimated_hours": 24,
    "storage_gb": 10
  }
}

Read the full file on GitHub · 198 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 2mo ago First seen · 198 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 2c13fb4b3a68

Subscribe to this mod's changes

planning is a command published in the GitHub repository OpenRaiser/NanoResearch (1,332 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,483 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Related

planning compared with commands from other repositories

planning next to 6 commands from other repositories
ModTypeStarsLast pushLicenceScanTokensWorks with
planningOpenRaiser/NanoResearchCommand1.3k28d agoMITA0Claude Code
checklistgithub/spec-kitCommand148kyesterdayMITA13Claude Code
clarifygithub/spec-kitCommand148kyesterdayMITA27Claude Code
specifygithub/spec-kitCommand148kyesterdayMITA13Claude Code
analyzegithub/spec-kitCommand148kyesterdayMITA26Claude Code
convergegithub/spec-kitCommand148kyesterdayMITA35Claude Code
implementgithub/spec-kitCommand148kyesterdayMITA14Claude Code