analyze-prow-job-resource

analyze-prow-job-resource is a command for Claude Code from openshift-eng/ai-helpers. It costs 9 tokens per session (220 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A report command for tracing the lifecycle of Kubernetes resources inside a Prow CI job. Kubernetes resources include objects such as pods and deployments, while Prow is a system that runs CI jobs.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it with one or more Prow job URLs and resource names to generate an interactive HTML lifecycle report.
Why use it?
It turns job audit logs and pod logs into a timeline, making it easier to see when a resource was created, changed, or removed.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter.

Part of the ci plugin — 34 skills, 21 commands, 2 agents shipped together

Good fit Use it with one or more Prow job URLs and resource names to generate an interactive HTML lifecycle report.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/analyze-prow-job-resource
Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/openshift-eng/ai-helpers

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install ci, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 34 skills, 21 commands, 2 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for analyze-prow-job-resource

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/analyze-prow-job-resource/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/analyze-prow-job-resource)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/analyze-prow-job-resource"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/analyze-prow-job-resource/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for analyze-prow-job-resource

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/analyze-prow-job-resource"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/openshift-eng/ai-helpers/analyze-prow-job-resource.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 9 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 220 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00009 $0.00220
Opus 5 $0.00005 $0.00110
Sonnet 5 $0.00002 $0.00044
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00022

Measured 10d ago against content hash f9db5863b284, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-10, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

analyze-prow-job-resource scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

Origin

Copies of this mod

1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:

plugins/ci/commands/analyze-prow-job-resource.md · 29 lines

What it actually says

Name

ci:analyze-prow-job-resource

Synopsis

Generate a report showing the lifecycle of a single resource:

/ci:analyze-prow-job-resource <prowjob-url> [namespace:][kind/][resource-name]

Generate a report showing multiple resource lifecycles:

/ci:analyze-prow-job-resource <prowjob-url> [namespace:][kind/][resource-name],[namespace:][kind/][resource-name],...

Description

Analyze the lifecycle of Kubernetes resource(s) in a Prow CI job by invoking the "prow-job-analyze-resource" skill.

Implementation

Pass the user's request to the skill, which will:

  • Download Prow job artifacts from Google Cloud Storage
  • Parse audit logs and pod logs
  • Generate an interactive HTML report with timeline visualization

The skill handles all the implementation details including URL parsing, artifact downloading, log parsing, and HTML report generation.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 10d ago First seen · 29 lines · 9 tokens per session scan A f9db5863b284

Subscribe to this mod's changes

analyze-prow-job-resource is a command published in the GitHub repository openshift-eng/ai-helpers (116 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 9 tokens to every session and 220 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.