Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/openvidu/openvidu.io/check-webgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/OpenVidu/openvidu.ioWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/openvidu/openvidu.io/check-web)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/openvidu/openvidu.io/check-web"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/openvidu/openvidu.io/check-web.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00566 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00008 | $0.00283 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00113 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00057 |
Grade A, and why
check-web scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 54 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Validate the current state of the website sources. Argument: $ARGUMENTS (empty for the fast
check, full to add the strict build).
Fast check (always)
Run from the repo root:
ovweb lint
(If ovweb is not installed: pip install -e "./publish-tool[validate]" first.)
It reports [check] file:line: message — hint lines at three severities. Act on them:
- error — CI fails on these. Fix every error in files this session touched; for errors in files you did not touch, fix them if the fix is unambiguous, otherwise list them for the user.
- warn — convention violations that do not block CI. Fix the ones caused by this session's edits; report pre-existing ones without fixing (they may be deliberate).
- info — janitorial; mention only if the user asked for a cleanup.
Never silence a finding by weakening the checker (publish-tool/src/ovweb/lint/) — the checker
changes only when a convention itself changes, with the user's agreement. What each check
enforces is documented in contributing/checks.md.
Full check (full argument)
After the fast check passes, also run what CI runs:
CI=false GOOGLE_ANALYTICS_KEY=G-XXXXXXXX mkdocs build --strict --site-dir /tmp/mkdocs-strict-validation
ovweb lint --site /tmp/mkdocs-strict-validation
- The build must end with zero WARNINGs — any WARNING is a failure to fix.
- Anchor
INFOlines in the build log are expected noise (~110pymdownx.tabbedfalse positives) —ovweb lint --siteis the authoritative anchor check, since it resolves every fragment against the ids actually present in the built HTML. - If
mkdocsis not installed locally, use the Docker image instead:docker run --rm -v ${PWD}:/docs -e GOOGLE_ANALYTICS_KEY=G-XXXXXXXX squidfunk/mkdocs-material build --strict -d /tmp/site.
If redirect rules or publish-tool/ovweb.yaml were touched this session, also run
ovweb redirects check. If any page was deleted or renamed this session, also run
ovweb lint --against origin/main — every removed page must be claimed by a redirect rule.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 54 lines · 15 tokens per session scan A 32f7f54b2e00
check-web is a command published in the GitHub repository OpenVidu/openvidu.io (5 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 15 tokens to every session and 566 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
monitor-ci
You are the orchestrator for monitoring Nx Cloud CI pipeline executions and handling self-healing fixes. You spawn the ci-monitor-subagent subagent to poll CI status and make decisions based on the results.
actions
Command "actions" from openclaw/crabbox, covering actions, subcommands, hydrate, register and dispatch.
dart-fix-ci
Command "dart-fix-ci" from dartsim/dart, covering required reading, workflow and output.
domains
Apply the CLI runtime and safety contract before executing a command. Runtime --help is authoritative.
access
Apply the CLI runtime and safety contract before executing a command. Runtime --help is authoritative.
check-release-health
Summarize the CI health of an OpenShift release using live data from the openshift-ci-mcp server.