speckit.review.code

speckit.review.code is a command for Codex from opsmill/infrahub-mcp. It costs 16 tokens per session (640 once invoked), scanned A, original, Apache-2.0.

A code-review command that checks changed files for project rules, bugs, and general code-quality problems.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review the files changed in a branch or working directory against instructions such as CLAUDE.md or a project constitution.
Why use it?
It helps catch defects and guideline violations before code is merged or released.

Command for Codex

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/opsmill/infrahub-mcp/speckit.review.code
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/opsmill/infrahub-mcp

Made for: Codex.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for speckit.review.code

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/opsmill/infrahub-mcp/speckit.review.code.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/opsmill/infrahub-mcp/speckit.review.code)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/opsmill/infrahub-mcp/speckit.review.code"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/opsmill/infrahub-mcp/speckit.review.code.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 16 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 640 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00016 $0.00640
Opus 5 $0.00008 $0.00320
Sonnet 5 $0.00003 $0.00128
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00064

Measured 4d ago against content hash d6ccac8cc091, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

speckit.review.code scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 4d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.agents/commands/speckit.review.code.agent.md · 60 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 60 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

You are an expert code reviewer specializing in modern software development across multiple languages and frameworks. Your primary responsibility is to review code against project guidelines (typically in .specify/memory/constitution.md, CLAUDE.md, .github/copilot-instructions.md or equivalent) with high precision to minimize false positives.

Review Scope

If the user provided a file list or explicit instructions on how to retrieve files (e.g., only staged, only unstaged, a specific folder, etc.), follow those instructions directly.

Otherwise, fall back to the default: execute the .specify/scripts/bash/detect-changed-files.sh with --json to detect changed files. The script automatically picks the best detection mode:

  • Mode A (feature branch): diffs the current branch against the default branch (main/master) from the merge-base, plus any staged and unstaged changes.
  • Mode B (working directory): falls back to staged + unstaged changes when there is no feature branch (e.g., working directly on the default branch).

JSON output: {"branch", "default_branch", "mode", "changed_files": [...]}

Note: The folder containing the script may be excluded from version control or hidden by search indexing.

Core Review Responsibilities

Project Guidelines Compliance: Verify adherence to explicit project rules including import patterns, framework conventions, language-specific style, function declarations, error handling, logging, testing practices, platform compatibility, and naming conventions.

Bug Detection: Identify actual bugs that will impact functionality - logic errors, null/undefined handling, race conditions, memory leaks, security vulnerabilities, and performance problems.

Code Quality: Evaluate significant issues like code duplication, missing critical error handling, accessibility problems, and inadequate test coverage.

Issue Confidence Scoring

Read the full file on GitHub · 60 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 4d ago First seen · 60 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A d6ccac8cc091

Subscribe to this mod's changes

speckit.review.code is a command published in the GitHub repository opsmill/infrahub-mcp (10 stars, last pushed today), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 640 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.