Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/orlando-japan/claude-code-setting/spec-archivegit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/orlando-japan/claude-code-settingWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/orlando-japan/claude-code-setting/spec-archive)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/orlando-japan/claude-code-setting/spec-archive"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/orlando-japan/claude-code-setting/spec-archive.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00014 | $0.00248 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00007 | $0.00124 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00050 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00025 |
Grade A, and why
spec-archive scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Archive the completed change folder $ARGUMENTS from openspec/changes/ into openspec/archive/, and merge its final spec.md into the canonical openspec/specs/ tree.
Pre-archive checklist (block archive if any fails):
- All tasks in
tasks.mdare checked. - The change has been merged into main (or is on a green PR).
- The full test suite passes.
- The spec's scenarios have corresponding tests (verify by cross-referencing).
- Any TODO / FIXME introduced by this change has a linked follow-up.
Merge rules for openspec/specs/:
- New capabilities go in a new file named after the capability.
- Amendments to existing capabilities append a
## Changessection at the bottom of the existing spec file, dated and linked to the change folder. - If the new spec contradicts an existing one, stop and surface the conflict to the user — don't silently resolve.
After archive, update the project changelog if one exists.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 23 lines · 14 tokens per session scan A 0843ebaf1abe
spec-archive is a command published in the GitHub repository orlando-japan/claude-code-setting (2 stars, last pushed 3mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 14 tokens to every session and 248 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.