Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/osiris-devworks/smart-citizen/pull_requestgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Osiris-DevWorks/smart-citizenWhat it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00025 | $0.01981 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00013 | $0.00991 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00005 | $0.00396 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00198 |
Grade A, and why
pull_request scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 138 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
/pull_request
Open or update a draft PR for the current branch, run Smart Citizen's documented self-review with checkpoints between each section, then offer to mark it ready for review.
Work through every section in order. After each section, stop at the CHECKPOINT and wait for the user to confirm before continuing. Never auto-fix a standards violation without confirming first.
Arguments
$ARGUMENTS may contain:
--testing "description"— manual-test notes the user has already performed. These flow into the Testing performed block of the PR body.--skip-draft— open the PR as ready-for-review immediately and skip the self-review walkthrough. Use only when the user has run the checks elsewhere or is intentionally bypassing the gate.
If no flags are passed, proceed with the default draft-then-walkthrough flow.
1. Branching model
- Confirm the current branch is not
main. PRs target the activerelease/X.Y.Zintegration branch, nevermaindirectly. - Identify the active integration branch: the highest
release/X.Y.Zthat exists on origin (git ls-remote --heads origin 'release/*'). The PR's base must match. - The version suffix signals scope. A patch branch (e.g.
release/1.4.2) is reserved for bug fixes and minor polish. If the diff includes new features or a meaningful behavior change, flag the scope mismatch — do not proceed silently.
CHECKPOINT — confirm the branching model setup before proceeding. Wait for the user.
2. PR scope
A PR should cover one concern: a single feature, a single bug fix, a batch of related bug fixes (same subsystem, same release-branch scope), a self-contained refactor, or a self-contained doc update. Mixed-concern PRs create review burden — surface candidate splits and let the user decide.
Run these against git diff --name-only $(git merge-base HEAD origin/main)...HEAD plus git diff --shortstat:
- File-count signal: more than 8 files touched outside a deliberate cross-cutting change (project-wide rename, doc reorganization, dep bump) → flag for scope review.
- Net-line signal: more than ~400 net lines changed, excluding generated files and lock files → flag for scope review.
- Concern-mixing signal: scan paths and patches. If any of these are mixed in one diff, list each cluster with its file list and ask the user to confirm or split:
- feature work in one subsystem + unrelated bug fix in another
- refactor of existing code + a new feature built on top of it (refactor first, ship, then build)
- doc rewrite unrelated to the code change
- "drive-by" formatting or rename edits in files not otherwise needed for the work
- Title sanity: if the working title needs "and" or a semicolon to describe both concerns, that's a split signal.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2d ago First seen · 138 lines · 25 tokens per session scan A daf5ee42db3c
pull_request is a command published in the GitHub repository Osiris-DevWorks/smart-citizen (99 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 25 tokens to every session and 1,981 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.
implement
Execute the implementation plan by processing and executing all tasks defined in tasks.md.