responsive-audit

responsive-audit is a command for Claude Code from Owl-Listener/designer-skills. It costs 20 tokens per session (202 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A command for checking how a design changes across screen sizes, including layout, text, spacing, content order, and touch targets.

In plain words
What is it for?
Use it to review breakpoints, responsive grids, typography, spacing, hierarchy, and touch-friendly controls, then produce recommended fixes.
Why use it?
It helps find layouts that break, become hard to read, or are difficult to use on smaller screens.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: argument-hint in frontmatter.

Part of the ui-design plugin — 19 skills, 5 commands shipped together

Good fit Use it to review breakpoints, responsive grids, typography, spacing, hierarchy, and touch-friendly controls, then produce recommended fixes.

Compare 6 commands from other repositories ↓
Install with agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/owl-listener/designer-skills/responsive-audit
About the project

Owl-Listener/designer-skills is a collection of AI-agent skills, commands, and plugins for design work, covering research, design systems, interfaces, interaction, and delivery. Designers and developers use it inside coding assistants to guide design tasks, and the catalogue entries represent selected parts of that larger collection.

Owl-Listener/designer-skills · 2,572 stars · on GitHub

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Owl-Listener/designer-skills

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install ui-design, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 19 skills, 5 commands.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for responsive-audit

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/owl-listener/designer-skills/responsive-audit/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/owl-listener/designer-skills/responsive-audit)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/owl-listener/designer-skills/responsive-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/owl-listener/designer-skills/responsive-audit/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

agentmods 80×15 button for responsive-audit

Your own site · 80×15
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/owl-listener/designer-skills/responsive-audit"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/owl-listener/designer-skills/responsive-audit.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>
Per session 20 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 202 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00020 $0.00202
Opus 5 $0.00010 $0.00101
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00040
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00020

Measured 6d ago against content hash e2def7ff16ce, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-09, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

responsive-audit scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

ui-design/commands/responsive-audit.md · 18 lines

What it actually says

/responsive-audit

Audit a design for responsive behavior.

Steps

  1. Breakpoints — Review behavior at each breakpoint using responsive-design skill.
  2. Grid — Check layout grid compliance using layout-grid skill.
  3. Typography — Verify type scaling using typography-scale skill.
  4. Spacing — Check spacing consistency using spacing-system skill.
  5. Hierarchy — Verify hierarchy holds at all sizes using visual-hierarchy skill.
  6. Touch targets — Verify minimum sizes for touch using responsive-design skill.
  7. Report — Document findings with recommendations.

Output

Responsive audit report with findings per breakpoint, compliance status, and remediation recommendations. Consider following up with /design-screen to redesign problem areas.

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 18 lines · 20 tokens per session scan A e2def7ff16ce

Subscribe to this mod's changes

responsive-audit is a command published in the GitHub repository Owl-Listener/designer-skills (2,572 stars, last pushed 3d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 20 tokens to every session and 202 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.