Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pablo-albaladejo/kaiordWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/pablo-albaladejo/kaiord/review-pr)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/pablo-albaladejo/kaiord/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/pablo-albaladejo/kaiord/review-pr/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/pablo-albaladejo/kaiord/review-pr"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/pablo-albaladejo/kaiord/review-pr.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00007 | $0.00445 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00003 | $0.00222 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00001 | $0.00089 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00044 |
Grade A, and why
review-pr scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 10d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Comprehensive PR Review Command
This command orchestrates multiple specialized review agents to perform a thorough pull request analysis.
Usage
/pr-review-toolkit:review-pr
Optional: Specify which aspects to review:
/pr-review-toolkit:review-pr comments tests errors
Review Aspects
Available review aspects (use agent names):
comment-analyzer- Check comment accuracy and documentationpr-test-analyzer- Analyze test coverage and qualitysilent-failure-hunter- Find error handling issuestype-design-analyzer- Review type design qualitycode-reviewer- General code quality reviewcode-simplifier- Identify simplification opportunities
What It Does
- Identifies files changed in the current branch
- Runs selected agents (or all agents if none specified)
- Aggregates findings from all agents
- Provides actionable feedback with file/line references
Example Workflows
Full comprehensive review:
/pr-review-toolkit:review-pr
Targeted review after addressing feedback:
/pr-review-toolkit:review-pr tests errors
Before committing:
/pr-review-toolkit:review-pr code-reviewer silent-failure-hunter
Agent Execution
Agents run in parallel for efficiency. Each agent:
- Analyzes only changed files
- Provides confidence scores
- References specific lines
- Suggests improvements
Output Format
Results are organized by agent with:
- Agent name and focus area
- Findings with severity/confidence scores
- File paths and line numbers
- Recommendations for fixes
Tips
- Run before creating PR for best results
- Use targeted reviews to verify specific fixes
- Address high-confidence/critical issues first
- Re-run after making changes to verify improvements
Requirements
- Must be in a git repository
- Changes should be committed or staged
- Works best with clear PR scope
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 10d ago First seen · 89 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A 50a6664f7187
review-pr is a command published in the GitHub repository pablo-albaladejo/kaiord (9 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 445 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
pr-ready
Run the project's pre-commit review loop to determine whether the current branch is ready to push — lint, tests, parallel pr-review-toolkit agents plus an over-engineering audit, fix-and-re-run until convergence.
plan-ready
Run a review-and-critique convergence loop on an implementation plan BEFORE any code is written — mirrors /pr-ready for the planning phase.
art-3d-pass
Review 3D art assets for export conventions, rigs, animation clips, materials, lighting, and LOD compliance.
audio-pass
Functional audio review for implementation, mix coverage, clarity, and player feedback.
economy-balance
Design or review the economy, sinks, faucets, rewards, and balance assumptions.
game-feel-pass
Review moment-to-moment feedback, response timing, and juice so core actions feel readable and satisfying.