Borrowing it
Nothing to install: this file belongs to panguard-ai/panguard-ai. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.
curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/panguard-ai/panguard-ai/main/.claude/commands/competitor-analysis.mdgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/panguard-ai/panguard-aiWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/panguard-ai/panguard-ai/competitor-analysis)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/panguard-ai/panguard-ai/competitor-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/panguard-ai/panguard-ai/competitor-analysis/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/panguard-ai/panguard-ai/competitor-analysis"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/panguard-ai/panguard-ai/competitor-analysis.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00383 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00153 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00077 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
competitor-analysis scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 2mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
/competitor-analysis — Analyze Competitor Positioning
Research and analyze competitors in the endpoint security / developer security space.
Input
The user may specify a competitor name, or say "overview" for a general landscape analysis.
Research Steps
-
Web search for the competitor's:
- Pricing page
- Product features
- Target audience
- Recent blog posts / announcements
- GitHub presence (if open source)
-
Compare against Panguard on these dimensions:
| Dimension | Panguard | Competitor |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing | Free / $9 / $29 / $79 | ? |
| Install time | 60 seconds, 1 command | ? |
| Target audience | Developers, SMBs | ? |
| Open source | ATR rules (MIT) | ? |
| AI capabilities | 3-tier funnel, 5 agents | ? |
| Detection rules | 3,760 Sigma + 5,961 YARA + ATR | ? |
| Compliance | TCSA, ISO 27001, SOC 2 | ? |
| CLI-first | Yes | ? |
- Identify Panguard advantages — what to highlight in marketing
- Identify gaps — what competitors offer that Panguard doesn't yet
- Suggest content angles — blog posts, comparison pages, social posts
Key Competitors to Track
- CrowdStrike (enterprise, expensive)
- SentinelOne (enterprise, AI-focused)
- Wazuh (open source SIEM)
- OSSEC (open source HIDS)
- Fail2ban (free, limited)
- Cloudflare Zero Trust (network-focused)
Output
Return a structured comparison report with actionable marketing recommendations.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 2mo ago First seen · 47 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A da9ac7e0a1a6
competitor-analysis is a command published in the GitHub repository panguard-ai/panguard-ai (67 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 383 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
competitor-analysis compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| competitor-analysispanguard-ai/panguard-ai | Command | 67 | today | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| checklistgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| clarifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 27 | Claude Code |
| specifygithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| convergegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 35 | Claude Code |
| speckit.bug.testgithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 13 | Claude Code |
| analyzegithub/spec-kit | Command | 148k | today | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |