Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pashki975/thm-claude-kitWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/pashki975/thm-claude-kit/enum-udp)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/pashki975/thm-claude-kit/enum-udp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/pashki975/thm-claude-kit/enum-udp/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/pashki975/thm-claude-kit/enum-udp"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/pashki975/thm-claude-kit/enum-udp.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00375 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00150 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00075 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00038 |
Grade A, and why
enum-udp scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Scan and enumerate UDP services on: $ARGUMENTS (target IP)
The gate (before any HEAVY step)
UDP scanning is slow — that's exactly why the gate matters. Reason first: did the top-ports scan already find the service we needed? A full 65535-port UDP sweep is HEAVY and usually low-yield — only justify it if the top-ports scan came up empty AND the room points at UDP. State the hypothesis before the full sweep; if weak, skip and say why.
CHEAP — always
nmap -sU --top-ports 50 -T4 $ARGUMENTS -oN scans/nmap-udp.txt- Follow up on whatever opened (these are cheap and targeted):
- 161 SNMP →
snmpwalk -v2c -c public $ARGUMENTS(users/processes leak creds) - 69 TFTP →
tftp $ARGUMENTS; 53 DNS →dig axfr @$ARGUMENTS <domain> - 500 IKE →
ike-scan $ARGUMENTS; 123 NTP →ntpq -p $ARGUMENTS
- 161 SNMP →
HEAVY — gate it
- Full UDP sweep
nmap -sU -p- --min-rate 1000 $ARGUMENTS— ONLY if top-ports found nothing and there's a real reason to think a high UDP port matters. Otherwise skip and move on.
Summarize
Lead with what the top-ports scan + follow-ups found. Note if you skipped the full sweep and why. Record SNMP/TFTP leaks in notes.md.
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 27 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 8d970d60f067
enum-udp is a command published in the GitHub repository pashki975/thm-claude-kit (2 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 375 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
dewey-classify
Classify a file using the DeweyGraph modular skill toolkit.
dewey-graph
Show the DeweyGraph link graph and heat maps for the current archive.
dewey-scan
Scan a folder with the DeweyGraph modular classifier and synthesise cross-links.
project-status
Summarize the current state of this client project.
pr
Create a pull request from the current branch.
wiki-query
Answer a question from the wiki's accumulated knowledge using index-first retrieval.