build

build is a command for coding agents from patrickserrano/lacquer. It costs 7 tokens per session (190 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

Build the iOS app for simulator.

Command

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/patrickserrano/lacquer/build
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/patrickserrano/lacquer

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for build

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/patrickserrano/lacquer/build.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/patrickserrano/lacquer/build)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/patrickserrano/lacquer/build"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/patrickserrano/lacquer/build.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 7 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 190 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin unknown No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5 $0.00007 $0.00190
Opus 5 $0.00003 $0.00095
Sonnet 5 $0.00001 $0.00038
Haiku 4.5 $0.00001 $0.00019

Measured today against content hash 746c47218b19, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-08-30, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

build scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

profiles/ios/commands/build.md · 30 lines

What it actually says

Build the {{PROJECT_NAME}} iOS app using flowdeck (see CLAUDE.md "Build & Test Tooling").

Steps

  1. Get a simulator UDID:

    flowdeck simulator list
    

    Pick an available iOS simulator and use its UDID — simulator names are ambiguous across OS versions, so never pass a name.

  2. Build:

    flowdeck build -w {{XCODEPROJ}} -s {{SCHEME}} -S <udid> -d {{COMPONENT_PREFIX}}DerivedData
    
  3. Report build result (success or failure with errors)

On Failure

If build fails:

  1. Parse error messages for file paths and line numbers
  2. Report specific errors with locations
  3. Do NOT attempt to fix unless explicitly asked
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. today First seen · 30 lines · 7 tokens per session scan A 746c47218b19

Subscribe to this mod's changes

build is a command published in the GitHub repository patrickserrano/lacquer (3 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 7 tokens to every session and 190 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.