What is coograph-review?

A code-review command that checks changes against specifications, project conventions, logic, and architecture. It reviews but does not edit files.

Use it to review a set of code changes, focusing first on files with the greatest likely impact.

It helps find defects and rule violations before changes are accepted or released.

How paullukic/coograph configures Claude Code

Reuse

Borrowing it

Nothing to install: this file belongs to paullukic/coograph. Take a copy, put it at the same path in your own repository, and replace the rules that are about this project with yours.

Copy the file

curl -O https://raw.githubusercontent.com/paullukic/coograph/main/.claude/commands/coograph-review.md

Clone the repo

git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/paullukic/coograph

Made for: Claude Code.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

README.md

[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/paullukic/coograph/coograph-review/github.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/paullukic/coograph/coograph-review)

Your own site

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/paullukic/coograph/coograph-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/paullukic/coograph/coograph-review/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>

Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.

Your own site · 80×15

<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/paullukic/coograph/coograph-review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/paullukic/coograph/coograph-review.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>

Per session 0 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.

When invoked 1,471 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.

Security scan A 0 findings. A grade says what 26 rules found in the file — not that it is safe.

Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.

Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

Model	Per session	Once invoked
Fable 5.1	$0.00000	$0.01471
Opus 5.5	$0.00000	$0.00588
Sonnet 5.5	$0.00000	$0.00294
Haiku 4.5	$0.00000	$0.00147

Measured 1mo ago against content hash fe42f9ae28cb, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-10-07, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

coograph-review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

.claude/commands/coograph-review.md · 125 lines

How it starts

The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 125 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.

Review the changes in scope for spec compliance, convention violations, logic bugs, and architectural issues. You review — you do not author. Never edit files.

Phase 0 — Orient with Code-Graph (MANDATORY — non-negotiable)

Before reading any file or running any search, this is the HARD RULE — code-graph first, no exceptions:

Call detect_changes() then get_review_context(files=[...changed files...]). ALWAYS start here. Use the returned file set and risk scores to drive the review. High-risk files first.
Fall back to sqlite3 .code-graph/graph.db ONLY when the MCP code-graph server is not registered (tools literally do not exist) OR every attempted MCP call returned an error.
Fall back to standard search/read tools ONLY when Step 1 AND Step 2 are both impossible because the code-graph DB is absent from the workspace.

"Slow", "unwieldy", "I already know the file", or "it's a small diff" are NOT valid reasons to bypass. When tracing consumers or write paths use query_graph("importers_of", file) and query_graph("callers_of", fn) before grepping. Every finding must still be verified from a fresh file read regardless of graph output.

Phase 1 — Anchor & Scope

Read AGENTS.md § Hard rules and .github/copilot-instructions.md (when AGENTS.md has no Hard rules section, .github/copilot-instructions.md holds them all): the binding rules and project conventions. Also read .github/instructions/review.instructions.md when it exists (review depth).
Run git diff origin/main --stat to list changed files with line counts.
If the project uses OpenSpec, read the active change's proposal.md, specs/, and tasks.md.

Phase 2 — Build the Change Manifest

The manifest is the primary review input — NOT raw diffs. Raw diffs cause misreads and phantom findings.

For each changed file, run git diff origin/main -- <file> one at a time.
Write a 1-2 line summary per file: what was renamed, added, removed, or rewired. Note old sources for nulled fields, old→new types for type changes.
Group changes by logical unit. Mark auto-generated files as "auto-generated, skip."

Read the full file on GitHub · 125 lines

Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

1mo ago Changed fe42f9ae28cb
1mo ago Changed · +4 lines 10fdf11724fd
1mo ago Changed · +15 lines 9d9ed42daef7
2mo ago First seen · 106 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 4e328d709397

Subscribe to this mod's changes

coograph-review is a command published in the GitHub repository paullukic/coograph (17 stars, last pushed 12d ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 1,471 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.

Code review ai-agents ai-coding ai-optimization ai-tools code-graph token-ai-optimizator

coograph-review next to 6 commands from other repositories
Mod	Type	Stars	Last push	Licence	Scan	Tokens	Works with
coograph-reviewpaullukic/coograph	Command	17	12d ago	MIT	A	0	Claude Code
assemble-teamtravisjneuman/.claude	Command	107	yesterday	MIT	A	25	Claude Code
review-codetravisjneuman/.claude	Command	107	yesterday	MIT	A	11	Claude Code
code-reviewhalflength-ampleness75/claude-code-recipes	Command	2	23d ago	MIT	A	13	Claude Code
amby.convergeambystechcom/AmbyKit	Command	2	yesterday	MIT	A	22	Claude Code
cg-senior-code-reviewakinalpfdn/claude-ground	Command	116	1mo ago	none	A	97	Claude Code
dejavu-lintHthSolid/claude-dejavu	Command	6	5mo ago	none	A	18	Claude Code

coograph: Command for Claude Code