Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pe-menezes/vibeflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/pe-menezes/vibeflow/vibeflow-analyze)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/pe-menezes/vibeflow/vibeflow-analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/pe-menezes/vibeflow/vibeflow-analyze/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/pe-menezes/vibeflow/vibeflow-analyze"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/pe-menezes/vibeflow/vibeflow-analyze.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00026 | $0.00055 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00010 | $0.00022 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00011 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00006 |
Grade A, and why
vibeflow-analyze scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured today.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Load the analyze skill with your skill tool and follow it, with these arguments: $ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- today First seen · 6 lines · 26 tokens per session scan A 2ccfb3f80c94
vibeflow-analyze is a command published in the GitHub repository pe-menezes/vibeflow (33 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 26 tokens to every session and 55 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-11-06.
vibeflow-analyze compared with commands from other repositories
| Mod | Type | Stars | Last push | Licence | Scan | Tokens | Works with |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vibeflow-analyzepe-menezes/vibeflow | Command | 33 | yesterday | MIT | A | 26 | Claude Code |
| util.gh-pr-reviewstefaniuk/loadout | Command | 1 | 19d ago | MIT | A | 8 | GitHub Copilot |
| review.speckit-codestefaniuk/loadout | Command | 1 | 19d ago | MIT | A | 53 | Claude Code, GitHub Copilot |
| review.speckit-teststefaniuk/loadout | Command | 1 | 19d ago | MIT | A | 47 | Claude Code, GitHub Copilot |
| code-reviewdvasyliev/ai-dev-tools-getting-started | Command | 22 | 2d ago | none | A | 0 | Claude Code |
| adr-reviewahamedzoha/atelier | Command | 3 | 4mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code, Cursor |
| refactorduongductrong/cursor-kit | Command | 23 | 7mo ago | MIT | A | 0 | Claude Code, Cursor |