Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/pedrol-cmd/brain-drinWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/pedrol-cmd/brain-drin/tech-debt)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/pedrol-cmd/brain-drin/tech-debt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/pedrol-cmd/brain-drin/tech-debt/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/pedrol-cmd/brain-drin/tech-debt"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/pedrol-cmd/brain-drin/tech-debt.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00017 | $0.00297 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00007 | $0.00119 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00059 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00030 |
Grade A, and why
tech-debt scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Tech Debt Analysis
Context
- Target: $ARGUMENTS (default: current directory)
- Dependencies: check for outdated packages
- Test coverage: check existing tests
Your Task
Scan for:
Code Quality
- Duplicated code blocks
- Functions over 50 lines
- Files over 300 lines
- Complex conditionals (cyclomatic complexity)
- Dead code (unused exports, unreachable branches)
- TODO/FIXME/HACK comments
Dependencies
- Outdated packages (major versions behind)
- Deprecated packages
- Packages with known vulnerabilities
- Unused dependencies
Testing
- Critical paths without tests
- Flaky tests (if test history available)
- Tests that test implementation instead of behavior
Architecture
- Circular dependencies
- God objects/modules
- Leaky abstractions
- Inconsistent patterns across the codebase
Output
## Tech Debt Report
### Critical (fix now)
[Items that will cause bugs or security issues]
### High (fix this sprint)
[Items causing developer pain or slowing velocity]
### Medium (fix this quarter)
[Items that will compound if ignored]
### Low (backlog)
[Nice to have improvements]
### Quick Wins
[Items that take <30min and remove meaningful debt]
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 63 lines · 17 tokens per session scan A b66737a6b0c5
tech-debt is a command published in the GitHub repository pedrol-cmd/brain-drin (12 stars, last pushed 6mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 17 tokens to every session and 297 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-03.
Other commands, from other repositories
qa-changes
This skill should be used when the user asks to "QA a pull request", "test PR changes", "verify a PR works", "functionally test changes", or when an automated workflow triggers QA validation of code changes. Provides a structured methodology for setting up the environment, exercising changed behavior, and reporting…
react-native
Command "react-native" from getsentry/toolkit, covering examples, also associate with a release and distribution(s), xcode build step (react-native xcode) and important notes.
doctor
Diagnosticar y reparar problemas del framework Don Cheli, git y entorno. Usa cuando el usuario dice "doctor", "problemas del framework", "don cheli no funciona", "repair Don Cheli", "debug setup", "setup broken", "framework broken", "reparar entorno". Detecta y repara issues de configuración, git y dependencias…
doctor
Badi configuration validation. Checks all Badi components and produces a diagnostic report.
http-service
Build, review or debug a Bun HTTP service. Loads the http-service skill, then works the task through its workflow.
auditar-cascading
Invoca cascading-failures-auditor — audita serviço para 5 triggers de cascade (sem timeout, retry sem jitter, sem circuit breaker, sem deadline, queue unbounded) e gera CASCADING-AUDIT.md.