Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/peterblazejewicz/claude-pluginsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/peterblazejewicz/claude-plugins/code-simplify)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/peterblazejewicz/claude-plugins/code-simplify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/peterblazejewicz/claude-plugins/code-simplify/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/peterblazejewicz/claude-plugins/code-simplify"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/peterblazejewicz/claude-plugins/code-simplify.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00016 | $0.00525 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00006 | $0.00210 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00105 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00052 |
Grade A, and why
code-simplify scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Invoke the dotnet-skills:code-simplification skill.
Simplify recently changed code (or the specified scope) while preserving exact behavior:
- Read
CLAUDE.mdand study project conventions —.editorconfig, analyzer severity, naming conventions, layering rules - Identify the target code — recent changes unless a broader scope is specified
- Understand the code's purpose, callers, edge cases, and test coverage before touching it
- Scan for C#-specific simplification opportunities:
- Deep nesting → guard clauses or extracted helpers
- Long methods → split by responsibility
- Nested ternaries →
switchexpressions or if/else - Generic names → descriptive names aligned with
.editorconfig - Manual null checks →
??,?., pattern-matching (is { } x), orArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull async voidand sync-over-async → properTask/ValueTaskwithCancellationToken- Mutable DTOs →
record/record struct - Duplicated logic → shared methods, extension methods, or
requiredproperties - Dead code → remove after confirming with callers and tests
- Apply each simplification incrementally — run
dotnet testanddotnet build -warnaserrorafter each change - Verify all tests pass, the build succeeds warning-free,
dotnet format --verify-no-changesis clean, and the diff is tight
If tests fail after a simplification, revert that change and reconsider. Use dotnet-skills:code-review-and-quality to review the result.
Source & Modifications
- Upstream:
addyosmani/agent-skills—.claude/commands/code-simplify.mdat pinned SHA44dac80 - Status: modified (skill references retargeted to the
dotnet-skills:prefix; convention-sources list adds.editorconfig/ analyzer severity / layering rules; simplification scan gains C#-idiomatic opportunities — null-coalescing, pattern-matching,ArgumentNullException.ThrowIfNull, async correctness,record/record struct; verification commands aredotnet test,dotnet build -warnaserror,dotnet format --verify-no-changes)
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 33 lines · 16 tokens per session scan A 03b451058203
code-simplify is a command published in the GitHub repository peterblazejewicz/claude-plugins (8 stars, last pushed 4mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 16 tokens to every session and 525 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.
Other commands, from other repositories
boot
Start a new PromptKit prompt assembly session (alias for /bootstrap).
bootstrap
Start a new PromptKit prompt assembly session.
new-config
Scaffold strongly-typed configuration with IOptions , validation, and environment-specific overrides.
new-middleware
Scaffold ASP.NET Core middleware with request/response pipeline, DI support, structured logging, and proper ordering.
new-worker
Scaffold a background worker using BackgroundService with PeriodicTimer, structured logging, graceful shutdown, and health checks.
dotnet-structure
Analyze and recommend .NET backend solution and folder structure improvements. Checks projects, layers, oversized files, and boundary clarity.