review

review is a command for Claude Code from peterblazejewicz/claude-plugins. It costs 22 tokens per session (472 once invoked), scanned A, original, MIT.

A five-part code review command for .NET and C# changes, covering correctness, readability, architecture, security, and speed.

In plain words
What is it for?
It is for reviewing staged, unstaged, or recently committed changes and reporting findings with file-and-line references and suggested fixes.
Why use it?
It helps catch bugs, design problems, unsafe code, and common performance issues before changes are merged.

Command for Claude Code

Written for Claude Code: shipped in a Claude Code plugin. Also seen: reads .claude/ paths.

Part of the dotnet-skills plugin — 24 skills, 9 commands, 4 agents shipped together

Install

Getting it into your agent

One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.

agentmods
npx agentmods add commands/peterblazejewicz/claude-plugins/review
Clone the repo
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/peterblazejewicz/claude-plugins

Made for: Claude Code.

Or install dotnet-skills, the plugin that ships this one along with the rest of its 24 skills, 9 commands, 4 agents.

Wrote this? Show the measurements

A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.

agentmods badge for review

README.md
[![agentmods](https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/peterblazejewicz/claude-plugins/review.svg)](https://agentmods.dev/commands/peterblazejewicz/claude-plugins/review)
Your own site
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/peterblazejewicz/claude-plugins/review"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/peterblazejewicz/claude-plugins/review.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>
Per session 22 Only the description is in the session, so the agent can decide to use it. The body loads when it is invoked.
When invoked 472 The whole file, excluding the scripts and references it only reads on demand.
Security scan A 0 findings. Scan, not verified.
Origin original No closer match found in the catalogue.
Token cost

What it costs to keep this loaded

Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.

ModelPer sessionOnce invoked
Fable 5.1 $0.00022 $0.00472
Opus 5 $0.00011 $0.00236
Sonnet 5 $0.00004 $0.00094
Haiku 4.5 $0.00002 $0.00047

Measured 6d ago against content hash eee7873c05c2, method: parsed. Prices are Anthropic first-party input rates as of 2026-09-06, from the pricing page.

Security

Grade A, and why

review scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 6d ago.

A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.

Nothing flagged

None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.

plugins/dotnet-skills/commands/review.md · 23 lines

What it actually says

Invoke the dotnet-skills:code-review-and-quality skill.

Review the current changes (staged, unstaged, or recent commits) across all five axes:

  1. Correctness — Does it match the spec? Edge cases handled? xUnit/MSTest coverage adequate? dotnet test passes? Nullable-reference-type annotations honest?
  2. Readability — Clear names? Straightforward logic? .editorconfig / analyzer diagnostics clean? Pattern-matching used where it helps, not for its own sake?
  3. Architecture — Follows existing patterns (Minimal APIs vs controllers, handler vs. service, DI lifetimes)? Clean boundaries between MyApp.Core / MyApp.Infrastructure / MyApp.Contracts? Right abstraction level?
  4. Security — Input validated at boundaries (FluentValidation)? No raw-SQL concatenation? Secrets out of source? Authz policies applied? (Use dotnet-skills:security-and-hardening)
  5. Performance — No EF Core N+1? No unbounded .ToListAsync()? No sync-over-async? No HttpClient allocated per-call? (Use dotnet-skills:performance-optimization-dotnet)

Categorize findings as Critical, Important, or Suggestion. Output a structured review with specific file.cs:line references and fix recommendations.


Source & Modifications

  • Upstream: addyosmani/agent-skills.claude/commands/review.md at pinned SHA 44dac80
  • Status: modified (skill references retargeted to the dotnet-skills: prefix and to the renamed skill performance-optimization-dotnet; each axis gains .NET-specific checks — nullable annotations, .editorconfig/analyzers, DI lifetimes, MyApp.Core/Infrastructure/Contracts layering, FluentValidation, EF Core N+1, sync-over-async, HttpClient reuse; file:line references use file.cs:line format)
Changes

What this file has done since we first saw it

Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.

  1. 6d ago First seen · 23 lines · 22 tokens per session scan A eee7873c05c2

Subscribe to this mod's changes

review is a command published in the GitHub repository peterblazejewicz/claude-plugins (7 stars, last pushed 2mo ago), licensed MIT. It adds 22 tokens to every session and 472 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-31.