Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow/bug-fixgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/Pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflowWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow/bug-fix)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow/bug-fix"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow/bug-fix.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00792 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00396 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00000 | $0.00158 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00079 |
Grade A, and why
bug-fix scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 3d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
Copies of this mod
1 near-identical copy found in the catalogue:
- bug-fix — 100% identical, 0 lines differ
How it starts
The opening of the file, as written. The whole thing — 121 lines — stays where its author put it; the contents beside it link to each section on GitHub.
Bug Fix Command
Implement the fix for the analyzed bug.
Usage
/bug-fix [bug-name]
Phase Overview
Your Role: Implement the solution based on the approved analysis
This is Phase 3 of the bug fix workflow. Your goal is to implement the fix while following project conventions.
Instructions
You are working on the fix implementation phase of the bug fix workflow.
-
Prerequisites & Context Loading
- Ensure analysis.md exists and is approved
Load ALL Context Once (Hierarchical Context Loading):
# Load steering documents (if available) claude-code-spec-workflow get-steering-contextBug documents to read directly:
.claude/bugs/{bug-name}/report.md.claude/bugs/{bug-name}/analysis.md- Understand the planned fix approach completely
-
Implementation Process
-
Follow the Implementation Plan
- Execute changes exactly as outlined in analysis.md
- Make targeted, minimal changes
- Follow existing code patterns and conventions
-
Code Changes
- Implement the fix following project standards
- Add appropriate error handling
- Include logging or debugging aids if needed
- Update or add tests as specified
-
Quality Checks
- Verify fix addresses the root cause
- Ensure no unintended side effects
- Follow code style and conventions
- Run tests and checks
-
-
Implementation Guidelines
- Follow steering documents: Adhere to patterns in tech.md and conventions in structure.md
- Make minimal changes: Fix only what's necessary
- Preserve existing behavior: Don't break unrelated functionality
- Use existing patterns: Leverage established code patterns and utilities
- Add appropriate tests: Ensure the bug won't return
-
Testing Requirements
- Test the specific bug scenario
- Verify related functionality still works
- Run existing test suite if available
- Add regression tests for this bug
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 3d ago First seen · 121 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A ad44367edf9d
bug-fix is a command published in the GitHub repository Pimzino/claude-code-spec-workflow (3,855 stars, last pushed 12mo ago), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 792 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
git
Git operations with intelligent commit messages and workflow optimization.
checklist
Generate a custom checklist for the current feature based on user requirements.
clarify
Identify underspecified areas in the current feature spec by asking up to 5 highly targeted clarification questions and encoding answers back into the spec.
specify
Create or update the feature specification from a natural language feature description.
analyze
Perform a non-destructive cross-artifact consistency and quality analysis across spec.md, plan.md, and tasks.md after task generation.
converge
Assess the current codebase against the feature's spec, plan, and tasks, then append any remaining unbuilt work as new tasks to tasks.md so implement can complete it.