Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/PostHog/posthog-fossWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/posthog/posthog-foss/commands.generated)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/posthog/posthog-foss/commands.generated"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/posthog/posthog-foss/commands.generated/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/posthog/posthog-foss/commands.generated"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/posthog/posthog-foss/commands.generated.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00000 | $0.00263 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00105 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00053 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00000 | $0.00026 |
Grade A, and why
COMMANDS.generated scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured yesterday.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
| Command | Also | What it does |
|---|---|---|
@posthog review [--deep] [--no-resolve] |
Start a Standard review of this pull request. --deep: Run a Deep review instead of the default Standard review. --no-resolve: Don't resolve review comments after a Deep review. By default the pull request owner's setting decides. |
|
@posthog stamp |
approve |
Ask Stamphog to review this pull request. Stamphog decides whether to approve. |
@posthog qa [<focus>] |
Run frontend QA on this pull request in PostHog Code and post a report. <focus>: What to focus on. The agent gets it as your instruction. |
|
@posthog loop <name> |
Run one of your own Loops with this pull request as its input. <name>: The loop's name. |
|
@posthog help |
List these commands. |
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- yesterday First seen · 10 lines · 0 tokens per session scan A 5cc8d1d2978c
COMMANDS.generated is a command published in the GitHub repository PostHog/posthog-foss (723 stars, last pushed today), licensed MIT. It costs nothing until one of its globs matches a file; then it loads 263 tokens. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-10-15.
Other commands, from other repositories
pr-enhance
Command "pr-enhance" from ruvnet/ruflo, covering pr-enhance, usage, options, examples and enhance pr.
audio-pass
Functional audio review for implementation, mix coverage, clarity, and player feedback.
test-value-review
Use when a diff adds or changes test files, when a PR claims coverage for config, CI workflows, templates, or HTML output, or when tests look written only to satisfy a "must have tests" rule; not for Playwright selector or performance hygiene (use /playwright-review).
auditar-refactor
Invoca refactor-safety-auditor — gate canônico antes de qualquer refactor. Coleta evidências (linhas, contrato externo, coverage, mutation) e retorna veredito GO/BLOCK/WARN/GO-OVERRIDE.
quality-check-command
This command performs comprehensive code quality checks. Use it before commits or when implementation is complete.
bug-check
Run automated tests and build checks first, then agent code review. For each bug found, propose or document a regression test.