Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
npx agentmods add commands/product-on-purpose/thinking-framework-skills/think-reframe-problemgit clone --depth 1 https://github.com/product-on-purpose/thinking-framework-skillsWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/product-on-purpose/thinking-framework-skills/think-reframe-problem)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/product-on-purpose/thinking-framework-skills/think-reframe-problem"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/product-on-purpose/thinking-framework-skills/think-reframe-problem.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5 | $0.00029 | $0.00311 |
| Opus 5 | $0.00015 | $0.00156 |
| Sonnet 5 | $0.00006 | $0.00062 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00003 | $0.00031 |
Grade A, and why
think-reframe-problem scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 5d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Run the think-reframe-problem recipe: 3 skills chained in a fixed order, carrying forward only the compressed artifact at each handoff.
The compression is the point. Do not paste a whole artifact into the next step; carry exactly what each handoff names, so the chain stays cheaper and sharper than running the skills back to back.
Run the steps in order, carrying forward only the compressed artifact between them:
think-problem-restatement-> carry the chosen working frame.think-evidence-vs-inference-sort(on the frame and its claims) -> carry the load-bearing unknowns.think-parallel-perspectives-review(on the reframed problem) -> carry the synthesis and central tension.
Composite artifact: a reframed problem statement, the assumptions it rests on, and a rounded read - a problem you can trust enough to start solving. Full prose and rationale: recipes/reframe-problem.md.
Apply the chain to: $ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 5d ago First seen · 21 lines · 29 tokens per session scan A b887da6e9ea6
think-reframe-problem is a command published in the GitHub repository product-on-purpose/thinking-framework-skills (14 stars, last pushed 18d ago), licensed Apache-2.0. It adds 29 tokens to every session and 311 once invoked, about $0.0001 per session on Opus 5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
doff
Doff the current masque and return to baseline Claude.
speckit.polish
Polish and complete speckit workflow — quality gate, docs, changelog, MR.
review
Recent git commits: !git log --oneline -10.
health
Check running Claude Code or Codex sessions, find zombies, offer to clean up safely.
quick
Quick 10-second context health check with quality score and top issues.
session-recap
Summarize recent CHANGELOG.md entries for context restoration. Parses the canonical heading shape ## YYYY-MM-DD — pass-N — summary. Filters: last N (default 10), YYYY-MM date prefix, or "today". Supports --json for machine-readable output.