Getting it into your agent
One page per mod, every tool's command on it. A separate URL per tool would split the same page into five that compete with each other.
git clone --depth 1 https://github.com/punt-labs/prfaqWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/punt-labs/prfaq/research)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/punt-labs/prfaq/research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/punt-labs/prfaq/research/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/punt-labs/prfaq/research"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/punt-labs/prfaq/research.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00374 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00150 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00075 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00037 |
Grade A, and why
research scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 1mo ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Research Evidence for PR/FAQ
Invoke the researcher agent to find evidence for claims in a PR/FAQ document.
Steps
-
Determine the input. If
$ARGUMENTSspecifies a.texfile path, pass it to the researcher to extract and verify all[CITATION NEEDED]markers and factual claims. If it specifies a claim or topic, pass that directly. If no argument is given, search forprfaq.texin the project root and pass its path. -
Invoke the researcher agent using the Task tool with
subagent_type: "prfaq:researcher". Pass the file path, claim, or topic in the prompt. -
Present the results to the user. The researcher returns:
- Evidence found per claim (with verdict: supported/unsupported/contradicted)
- Bibliography entries ready to append to the
.bibfile - Research gaps where no evidence was found
The researcher automatically saves its findings to
./research/research-YYYY-MM-DD-TOPIC.md. Future runs reuse cached results instead of re-searching the web. -
Offer to update the document. If the researcher found new sources:
- Append new
.bibentries to the bibliography file - Add
\cite{}commands to the.texfile where claims now have sources - Replace
[CITATION NEEDED]markers with proper citations - Recompile the PDF
- Append new
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 1mo ago First seen · 29 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A db8f3dfb05c7
research is a command published in the GitHub repository punt-labs/prfaq (25 stars, last pushed 28d ago), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 374 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-08-30.
Other commands, from other repositories
elaborate-dev
Elaborate a Z specification with narrative from design documentation.
oracle-dev
Generate property-based test harness using Lean 4 model as oracle.
refine-dev
Verify code refines Z specification via abstraction function and commutativity checks.
refine
Verify code refines Z specification via abstraction function and commutativity checks.
setup-dev
Install and configure fuzz, probcli, and lean dependencies.
setup
Install and configure fuzz, probcli, and lean dependencies.