Getting it into your agent
This one installs as part of its plugin. Adding the marketplace and installing the plugin brings it with everything else the plugin ships.
/plugin marketplace add punt-labs/punt-kit/plugin install punt-devWrote this? Show the measurements
A badge with what this costs and how it scanned, read live from this page, so it follows the numbers instead of freezing them. Markdown for a README, HTML for a documentation site or a project page.
[](https://agentmods.dev/commands/punt-labs/punt-kit/bead-review-dev)<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/punt-labs/punt-kit/bead-review-dev"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/punt-labs/punt-kit/bead-review-dev/github.svg" alt="Measured on agentmods" height="20"></a>Or the 80×15 button, for a site that already has a row of RSS and ATOM ones. Only the verdict fits; the numbers stay here.
<a href="https://agentmods.dev/commands/punt-labs/punt-kit/bead-review-dev"><img src="https://agentmods.dev/badge/commands/punt-labs/punt-kit/bead-review-dev.svg" alt="Reviewed on agentmods" width="80" height="20"></a>What it costs to keep this loaded
Counted locally with the o200k_base tokenizer, which is exact for GPT models; Claude uses its own tokenizer and its counts differ. Treat this as one consistent yardstick across the catalogue rather than a bill. Prices are per million input tokens.
| Model | Per session | Once invoked |
|---|---|---|
| Fable 5.1 | $0.00012 | $0.00130 |
| Opus 5.5 | $0.00005 | $0.00052 |
| Sonnet 5.5 | $0.00002 | $0.00026 |
| Haiku 4.5 | $0.00001 | $0.00013 |
Grade A, and why
bead-review-dev scanned grade A with 0 findings against 26 rules in 11 categories — prompt injection, anti-refusal, data exfiltration, privilege escalation, supply chain, agent snooping, system-prompt leakage, SSRF and excessive agency — measured 26d ago.
A static scan of the body, not an audit. Every finding is printed with the line that produced it so you can judge whether it matters here. A mod is markdown that instructs an agent; that is exactly why what it instructs is worth reading.
Nothing flagged
None of the 26 patterns this scan looks for appear in this file: no shell pipes, no recursive deletes, no credential paths, no hidden text, no instruction-override or anti-refusal phrasing, no agent-config snooping. That is not a guarantee, it is the absence of the things that are checkable.
What it actually says
Load and execute the local working tree's bead-review skill
(${CLAUDE_PLUGIN_ROOT}/skills/bead-review/SKILL.md).
Read the skill file first, then run it against the current repo (or the repo named in the argument, if given).
Arguments: $ARGUMENTS
What this file has done since we first saw it
Hashed on every crawl. A supply-chain change to an agent config is a question of when, not whether, so the history is kept rather than the latest state alone.
- 26d ago First seen · 19 lines · 12 tokens per session scan A 23273881cbf1
bead-review-dev is a command published in the GitHub repository punt-labs/punt-kit (1 stars, last pushed yesterday), licensed MIT. It adds 12 tokens to every session and 130 once invoked, about $0.0000 per session on Opus 5.5. A static security scan graded it A with 0 findings. No closer match exists in the catalogue, so it is treated as the original; first seen 2026-09-20.
Other commands, from other repositories
simplify
The over-engineering review: five tags (delete, stdlib, native, yagni, shrink), a mandatory replacement per finding, and a real null result when there is nothing to cut.
init
Install the formatters this repository needs, with every command visible before it runs.
git
The pre-finish status: branch, hygiene findings, message checks, workflow lint, template state.
check-dev
Type-check a Z specification with fuzz.
extend
Capture a mid-PR sub-idea and implement it onto the current open PR's branch — no new branch, no new PR. Preserves Verify → Review → Deliver.
fec-smell
Diagnose frontend code smells with evidence and candidate refactorings without changing business code.